{"id":54,"date":"2025-05-26T16:44:44","date_gmt":"2025-05-26T16:44:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=54"},"modified":"2025-07-29T21:22:32","modified_gmt":"2025-07-29T21:22:32","slug":"direct-democracy","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/chapter\/direct-democracy\/","title":{"raw":"Direct Democracy","rendered":"Direct Democracy"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"textbox textbox--examples\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">\r\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Chapter Summary<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/header>\r\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\r\n<p class=\"import-pf\">The United States follows a model of representative democracy, where citizens elect public officials to make decisions on their behalf. Direct democracy is a unique institutional feature available in some states to engage constituents directly with policymaking. Roughly half of all states utilize mechanisms like initiatives, referendums, and recalls allowing voters direct input. This chapter discusses the differences between direct and representative democracy, differences in direct democratic institutions across the states, the origins of direct democracy, and arguments for and against direct democracy.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">\r\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Student Learning Objectives<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/header>\r\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\r\n<p class=\"import-paft\">Upon completion of this chapter, students should be able to:<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Recognize the differences between representative and direct democracy.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Compare and contrast among the three major institutions (initiative, referendum, and recall) of direct democracy.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Identify differences among the four major types of initiatives (statutory, constitutional, direct, and indirect).<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Identify differences between the two major types of referendum (legislative and popular).<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Explain the origins of direct democracy in the United States.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Analyze how state variation in the process of direct democracy is associated with state differences in the frequency of its use.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Evaluate both arguments in favor of and opposed to direct democracy.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Assess the educative effects of direct democracy.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Evaluate recent efforts by state governments to limit how citizens are able to utilize direct democracy.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--exercises\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">\r\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Focus Questions<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/header>\r\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\r\n<p class=\"import-paft\">These questions illustrate the main concepts covered in the chapter and should help guide discussion as well as enable students to critically analyze and apply the material covered.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-ulf\" style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: 18pt;\">In what ways have the founding fathers been successful in designing a government that limits the role of popular opinion in governance? How have those institutions they created to minimize the \u201cpassions of the people\u201d changed or remained over time?<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-ul\" style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: 18pt;\">How are states different in their use of direct democratic institutions?<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-ul\" style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: 18pt;\">How difficult should the process be for an initiative, referendum, or recall to make the ballot?<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-ul\" style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: 18pt;\">What are some of the arguments in favor of direct democracy? What are some of the arguments against it?<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h1 class=\"import-ah\">What Is Direct Democracy?<\/h1>\r\n<p class=\"import-paft\">When Benjamin Franklin was exiting the Constitutional Convention, a woman by the name of Elizabeth Willing Powel asked him, \u201cWhat have we got, a republic or a monarchy?\u201d Franklin replied, \u201cA republic if you can keep it.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Miller, \u201c\u2018Republic If You Can Keep It.\u2019\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> The United States was established as a <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">republic<\/strong><\/span> or <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">representative democracy<\/strong><\/span> where citizens play an active role in government by voting for representatives to make decisions in government on their behalf. While some argue that being established as a republic precludes being a democracy, that is a false contrast or a distinction without a difference.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Beauchamp, \u201cSen. Mike Lee\u2019s Tweets\u201d; Dobski, \u201cAmerican Is a Republic\u201d; Elvin, \u201cIs America a Democracy?\u201d; Keating, \u201cReal Reason Why\u201d; Thrush, \u201c\u2018We\u2019re Not a Democracy.\u2019\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n\r\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\r\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">We\u2019re not a democracy.<\/p>\r\n\u2014 Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SenMikeLee\/status\/1314016169993670656?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 8, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote>\r\n<script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\r\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\r\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Democracy isn\u2019t the objective; liberty, peace, and prospefity are. We want the human condition to flourish. Rank democracy can thwart that.<\/p>\r\n\u2014 Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SenMikeLee\/status\/1314089207875371008?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 8, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote>\r\n<script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\r\n\r\n<strong><span class=\"import-fighn\">Figure 7.1\u00a0<\/span>Senator Mike Lee\u2019s Tweets<\/strong>\r\n<strong><em>Source: \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/SenMikeLee\/status\/1314016169993670656?mx=2\">We\u2019re not a democracy<\/a>.\u201d and \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/SenMikeLee\/status\/1314089207875371008\">Democracy isn\u2019t the objective; liberty, peace, and prospefity [sic] are. We want the human condition to flourish. Rank democracy can thwart that.<\/a>\u201d by Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) on x.com (formerly Twitter). Embedded per <a href=\"https:\/\/developer.x.com\/en\/developer-terms\/display-requirements\">https:\/\/developer.x.com\/en\/developer-terms\/display-requirements<\/a>.<\/em><\/strong>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">To the extent the republican form of government in the United States is not considered a democracy, that is in contrast to a <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">pure<\/strong><\/span> or <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">direct democracy<\/strong><\/span>, a system of government where citizens vote directly on policies rather than indirectly through elected officials. Democracy has its roots in ancient Greece. The word <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">democracy<\/em><\/span> stems from the Greek word <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">demos<\/em><\/span> (which means \u201cthe people\u201d) and <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">kratos<\/em><\/span> (which means \u201crule\u201d)\u2014literally, \u201crule by the people.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The founding fathers chose to pursue a representative democracy rather than a direct democracy based on their concerns about human nature, mob rule, and tyrannical majorities. James Madison wrote, \u201cIf men were angels, no government would be necessary.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Hamilton et al., Federalist Papers.[\/footnote]<\/sup> Almost two centuries later, former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill famously remarked that \u201cit has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Churchill, \u201cWorst Form of Government.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> The founders certainly had these types of concerns in mind, as previously described in <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">Chapter 2<\/span><\/span>; the Constitution structured a government in an attempt to balance <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">majority rule with minority rights<\/strong><\/span>. Through a system of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism, the Constitution was designed to ensure that too much power was not concentrated in a single institution or with a single elected official. Yet a republican form of government would best ensure the protection of rights and liberties.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">At the time the Constitution was ratified, only members of the US House of Representatives were directly elected by citizens. Senators were indirectly elected by state legislatures until the passage of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913. Supreme Court justices receive lifetime appointments without any direct citizen involvement in their nomination or retention. Even the process of amending the Constitution in Article V does not provide a direct way for citizens to participate. Twenty-six of the twenty-seven amendments to the Constitution have been ratified by receiving two-thirds support in each chamber of Congress and at least three-fourths of the country\u2019s state legislatures. There is no process for a national referendum. Voting for the president is the only national vote citizens in the United States take, and even it remains an indirect vote based on the role of the Electoral College in electing the president. So while the federal government follows a representative form of democracy, significant state variation exists in the institutions of direct democracy.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h1 class=\"import-ah\">What Are the Different Institutions in Direct Democracy?<\/h1>\r\n<p class=\"import-paft\">While citizens have no direct role or ability to vote for or against prospective amendments to the US Constitution, citizens of nearly every state have the opportunity to affect change to their state constitutions. In forty-nine out of the fifty states, citizens have some sort of role or mechanism to approve proposed state constitutional amendments.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cConstitutional Amendment.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> Delaware is the sole exception, where the state legislature controls the process without direct voter participation. The rest of this discussion will extend beyond just state constitutional amendments.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The three major forms or types of direct democracy are the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">initiative<\/strong><\/span>, the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">referendum<\/strong><\/span>, and the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">recall<\/strong><\/span>. An initiative is a citizen-driven ballot measure to pass a new policy or to direct the state legislature to vote on said policy. A referendum, the most common form of direct democracy, is when citizens vote on a policy that has already been considered by the state (or local) government. A recall is a vote to remove an elected official before their term expires.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_282\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"624\"]<img class=\"wp-image-282 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.2-Direct-Democracy-by-State.jpg\" alt=\"United States map showing which states have each type, or no, direct democracy. 17 states have no direct democracy, 13 states have initiative, referendum and recall, 3 states have initiative only, 2 states have referendum only, 7 states have recall only, and 8 states have initiative and referendum.\" width=\"624\" height=\"437\" \/> <strong>Figure 7.2 - Direct Democracy by State<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201cForms of Direct Democracy in the American States.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Forms_of_direct_democracy_in_the_American_states\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Forms_of_direct_democracy_in_the_American_states<\/a>. Map made by author.<\/strong>[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\"><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">Figure 7.2<\/span><\/span> demonstrates that seventeen of the fifty states have no direct democratic institutions in their states. These states are largely concentrated in the South, mid-Atlantic, and New England. With the exception of Iowa and Texas, states without any direct democratic institutions are east of the Mississippi River. The remaining thirty-three states have some sort of direct democratic institution. Thirteen states possess all three forms (initiative, referendum, and recall). Geographically, with the exception of Michigan, they are all west of the Mississippi River. This geographic pattern will be explored in more detail in the next section (<span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">\u201cWhat Are the Origins of Direct Democracy in the United States?\u201d<\/span><\/span>).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Twenty-four states have some access to the initiative process.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]National Conference of State Legislatures, \u201cInitiative and Referendum States.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> The two primary types of initiatives are <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">statutory<\/strong><\/span> and <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">constitutional initiatives<\/strong><\/span>. Statutory initiatives provide voters the opportunity to pass a new law, whereas constitutional initiatives involve adding language or amending the state constitution. Twenty-one states have the statutory initiative and six have both types, while Florida, Illinois, and Mississippi only have the constitutional initiative. Within these two types of initiatives, differences also exist in whether voters directly or indirectly play a role.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_283\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"624\"]<img class=\"wp-image-283 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.3-Initiative-Process-by-State.jpg\" alt=\"United States map showing which states have constitutional iniatives, statutory initiatives, both, or neither. 3 states have consitutional initiatives, 6 states have statutory initiatives, 15 states have both, and 26 states have neither.\" width=\"624\" height=\"437\" \/> <strong>Figure 7.3 - Initiative Process by State<br \/>Data Source: National Conference of State Legislatures. \u201cInitiative and Referendum States.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-states\">https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-states<\/a>. Map made by author.<\/strong>[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The first type is known as a <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">direct initiative<\/strong><\/span>. This form of direct democracy is what comes to mind for most when thinking about the initiative. Here citizens or organized groups create a measure that they would like to be placed on the ballot. This process involves collecting a sufficient number of signatures from registered voters throughout the state to qualify for ballot access. If the initiative successfully makes it onto the ballot, voters <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">directly<\/em><\/span> consider it by voting yes or no. This stands in contrast to an <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">indirect initiative<\/strong><\/span>, where an additional step is involved. Prior to the initiative being placed on the ballot, it is first considered by the state legislature. If the legislature approves the initiative, it becomes law. If, however, the legislature rejects the initiative, then voters get the chance to vote on the measure to override the state legislature.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Of the twenty-one states with the statutory initiative, twelve of them utilize the direct initiative. Seven states possess the indirect initiative. Utah and Wyoming voters can utilize both the direct and indirect processes. Of the three states with only the constitutional initiative, Florida and Illinois directly place the ballot measure before voters.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">In Mississippi, they have utilized the indirect initiative since 1992. However, the process in Mississippi has been in limbo since 2021.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Pittman, \u201c\u2018Democracy Dies Blow by Blow.\u2019\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> The Mississippi Constitution, specifically section 273(3), requires that citizens seeking to place a measure on the ballot gather one-fifth of their required signatures from each of Mississippi\u2019s five congressional districts. After successfully submitting enough signatures to get a medical marijuana initiative on the ballot, the Mississippi Supreme Court struck down the measure, identifying that it failed to meet the signature requirements because Mississippi lost one of its five congressional districts due to redistricting after the 2000 Census: \u201cWhether with intent, by oversight, or for some other reason, the drafters of section 273(3) wrote a ballot-initiative process that cannot work in a world where Mississippi has fewer than five representatives in Congress.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Pittman, \u201c\u2018Democracy Dies Blow by Blow.\u2019\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> This 2021 decision is the second time the Mississippi Supreme Court has struck down the initiative, having done so previously in 1922, overturning the will of voters from 1914.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The 2024 election is poised to feature twenty-three statutory initiatives and thirteen constitutional initiatives. These thirty-four initiatives cover many diverse policy areas, including abortion, tax reform, raising the minimum wage, marijuana legalization, election reform, and changes to the initiative process itself.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201c2024 Ballot Measures.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The citizen-initiative process is quite similar to the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">popular referendum<\/strong><\/span> process. Also known as a veto referendum, citizens initiate a process to create a ballot measure asking voters to consider approving or repealing a piece of legislation already passed by their state legislature. Twenty-three states possess veto referendums. Citizens enjoy a very high success rate (65 percent) of repealing legislation passed by state legislatures if they are able to make it to the ballot.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cList of Veto Referendum Ballot Measures.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> Some examples of recently repealed measures include the Maine state legislature attempting to repeal the use of ranked-choice voting and a Missouri law that attempted to make the Show-Me-State a right-to-work state.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" style=\"width: 100%;\" cellpadding=\"0pt 5.4pt\"><caption><strong><em><span class=\"import-thn\">Table 7.1 - <\/span>Success Rate of Veto Referendums, 1906\u20132022<\/em>\r\n<em><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\">Data Source:<\/span> Ballotpedia. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/encyclopedia.federalism.org\/index.php?title=State_Constitutional_Rights_Federalism\">List of Veto Referendum Ballot Measures<\/a>.\u201d n.d. Table made by author.<\/em>\r\n<\/strong><\/caption>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>State<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Total Number of\r\n<\/strong><strong>Veto Referendums<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Number of <\/strong><strong>Laws Upheld<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Number of <\/strong><strong>Laws Repealed<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">WA<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">39<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">8<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(21%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">31<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(79%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">OR<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">68<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">24<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(35%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">44<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(65%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">CA<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">50<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">21<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(42%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">29<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(58%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">AK<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(50%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(50%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">NV<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(100%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">0<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(0%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">ID<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">7<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(43%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(57%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">WY<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(100%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">0<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(0%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">MT<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">13<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(31%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">9<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(69%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">CO<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">14<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(29%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">10<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(71%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">UT<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">0<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(0%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(100%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">AZ<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">35<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">19<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(54%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">16<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(46%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">NM<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(67%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(33%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">ND<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">75<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">28<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(37%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">47<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(63%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">SD<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">46<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">13<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(28%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">33<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(72%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">NE<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">17<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(35%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">11<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(65%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">OK<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">20<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">8<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(40%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">12<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(60%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">MO<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">26<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(4%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">25<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(96%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">AR<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">9<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(11%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">8<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(89%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">MI<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">10<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(10%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">9<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(90%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">OH<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">13<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(15%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">11<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(85%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">MD<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">18<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">11<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(61%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">7<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(39%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">MA<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">22<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">12<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(55%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">10<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(45%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">ME<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">31<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">13<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(42%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">18<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">(58%)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The other form of referendum is the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">legislative referendum<\/strong><\/span>. Rather than a process initiated by the voters, the state legislature poses the question for voters to consider. All fifty states possess the legislative referendum, with many required by law to put measures in front of voters to amend the state constitution or make tax reforms.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]National Conference of State Legislatures, \u201cInitiative and Referendum Overview.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> Voters across the fifty states saw more than one hundred referred ballot measures in 2024.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201c2024 Ballot Measures.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> For example, California voters will vote on Proposition 3 to repeal a prior 2008 vote (Proposition 8) that defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman. The United States is one of the rare advanced industrial democracies to not have a national legislative referendum process.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Qvortrup, Referendums Around the World.[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The final institution of direct democracy is the recall. Twenty states have the ability to recall an elected official before their term expires. Seven states possess solely the recall with no other form of direct democracy in their state. Wanting to remove an elected official before their term ends is easier said than done, as most attempts at a recall never make it to the ballot. Through the first six months of 2024, 100 out of 164 attempts did not make the ballot. Out of the 64 that made the ballot, 38 were removed from office (i.e., the recall was successful), 6 quit (the recall had the intended effect), and 20 attempts were defeated (the incumbent remained in office).<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cRecall Overview.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_284\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"507\"]<img class=\"wp-image-284\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.4-Success-of-Recall.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"507\" height=\"296\" \/> <strong>Figure 7.4 - Success of Recall Efforts<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201cPolitical Recall Efforts.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Political_recall_efforts\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Political_recall_efforts<\/a>. Table made by author.<\/strong>[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Compared to statewide office holders, more attempts (and more success) to recall elected officials happen at the local level. Members of school boards and city councils are more likely to face (and lose) recall compared to governors or state legislatures. Only two governors have ever successfully been recalled in US history. The most prominent and recent successful recall was when California voters removed Governor Gray Davis in 2003. Davis, a Democrat, was first elected in 1998 with almost 58 percent of the vote. In 2002, he was reelected with 47 percent of the vote. However, less than one year after receiving a second term, Davis was recalled with 55 percent of the vote. He was recalled, in part, due to an energy crisis and budget deficit associated with the dot-com bubble burst.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Wilson, \u201c\u2018If This Thing Qualifies.\u2019\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> In a subsequent election, he was replaced by actor Arnold Schwarzenegger.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cGray Davis Recall\u201d; National Public Radio, \u201cGray Davis Reflects.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_199\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"219\"]<img class=\"wp-image-199 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.5-219x300.jpg\" alt=\"Headshot of Gray Davis.\" width=\"219\" height=\"300\" \/> <strong><span class=\"import-fighn\">Figure 7.5 - <\/span>Governor Gray Davis<br \/>Source: \"<a href=\"https:\/\/flickr.com\/photos\/42757699@N04\/5094533137\">Gray Davis<\/a>\" by Neon Tommy on Flickr \/ <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA<\/a>.<\/strong>[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">More recently, many partisan activists have sought to recall governors, such as Scott Walker in Wisconsin in 2012 and Gavin Newsom in California in 2021.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cScott Walker Recall\u201d; Ballotpedia, \u201cGavin Newsom Recall.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> After expensive and nasty partisan battles, both Walker and Newsom were able to remain in office after unsuccessful recall efforts.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h1 class=\"import-ah\">What Are the Origins of Direct Democracy in the United States?<\/h1>\r\n<p class=\"import-paft\">The roots of direct democracy in the United States predate the official founding as an independent country by more than one hundred years. Many New England states, then colonies, began hosting regular <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">town hall meetings<\/strong><\/span>. These participatory meetings facilitate a model of <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">deliberative democracy<\/strong><\/span>, where citizens engage in open discussion before publicly voting on matters of civic interest. However, how truly open, inclusive, and participatory they were is open to debate.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Bryan, Real Democracy; Zimmerman, New England Town Meeting; Zuckerman, \u201cMirage of Democracy.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> Rather than hiding behind the safety and anonymity of the secret ballot or behind the \u201ctoo-big\u201d mechanisms of government institutions, the town hall format \u201cforced civility.\u201d Today, these meetings occur annually as the sole method of governing. For example, the residents of Elmore, Vermont, voted in 2023 to keep their town hall tradition alive by more than a 2\u20131 margin.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Perry and Rathke, \u201cIn Vermont, \u2018Town Meeting.\u2019\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n[embed]https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=D61uQw7DeXI[\/embed]\r\n<p class=\"import-figh\"><em><strong><span class=\"import-fighn\">Figure 7.6 - <\/span>New England Town Hall Meetings<\/strong><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\">\r\n<strong>Source:<\/strong><\/span><strong> ConcordNHTV. \"Town Meeting Day: A New England Tradition.\" YouTube, Mar 2, 2024.\u00a0<span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId133\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=D61uQw7DeXI\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=D61uQw7DeXI<\/span><\/a><\/span>. \/ Embedded with the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/static?template=terms\">Standard YouTube License.<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Outside of New England, states were slower to implement aspects of direct democracy into their state and local governments. Thomas Jefferson unsuccessfully proposed that Virginia voters should ratify the state\u2019s 1775 constitution. Throughout the late 1700s and early 1800s, many states wrote or rewrote their constitutions and incorporated voter approval, especially for constitutional amendments.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cI&amp;R Historical Timeline\u201d; Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cHistory of the Initiative.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">In 1848, Switzerland ratified a new constitution, moving the country from a confederacy to a federal system of government, as described in <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">Chapter 2<\/span><\/span>. As part of this new government, Swiss citizens were given the right to vote in popular initiatives, mandatory (legislative) referendums, and optional (popular) referendums.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> While the US did not follow suit, Congress did require that all states admitted to the union after 1857 must provide voters the ability to ratify their state constitutions.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The late 1800s and early 1900s mark the period when political parties were perhaps the strongest in our country\u2019s history.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Sundquist, Dynamics of the Party System.[\/footnote]<\/sup> Jobs were allocated, and many public services were provided solely to partisan supporters based on a system of patronage. This Gilded Age was characterized by soaring economic growth, rapid urbanization, rising income inequality, and rampant political corruption, often at the hands of party bosses. As a result, many citizens sought change. The <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">Populist Party<\/strong><\/span> became the first third party to win Electoral College votes since the end of the Civil War, when they carried five states and twenty-two Electoral College votes.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Dave Leip\u2019s Atlas of U.S. Elections, \u201c1892 Presidential General Election Results.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> Four years later, many of the ideas of the Populist Party were consolidated into the Democratic Party\u2019s platform and William Jennings Bryan\u2019s nomination as president.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">Progressive Era<\/strong><\/span>, more broadly, included all sorts of \u201cgood government\u201d reforms. States switched to the secret, or Australian, ballot rather than ballots printed and distributed by political parties. Patronage was replaced with a merit system as part of broader civil service reforms. The direct election of US Senators was added to the Constitution when the Seventeenth Amendment was ratified in 1913. Women were granted the right to vote when the Nineteenth Amendment was ratified in 1920. Parties began to utilize primaries to pick candidates for the general election.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">During the Progressive Era, direct democracy began to spread across the United States. The Swiss model was replicated first by South Dakota in 1897. Returning to <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">Figure 7.2<\/span><\/span>, the vast majority of states that implemented direct democracy were geographically west of the Mississippi River. These states were more likely to experience competition between the two major parties (Democrats and Republicans) but also saw third parties (like the Populist Party) enjoy a good deal of success.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cI&amp;R Historical Timeline\u201d; Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cHistory of the Initiative\u201d; Smith and Fridkin, \u201cDelegating Direct Democracy,\u201d 333\u2013350.[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n\r\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" cellpadding=\"0pt 5.4pt\"><caption><strong><em><span class=\"import-thn\">Table 7.2 - <\/span>Year of Initiative Adoption by State<\/em>\r\n<em><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\">Data Source:<\/span> Initiative and Referendum Institute. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/64fb2a824bc4a564c732b324\/t\/6547f6da992d3b25ee06bbae\/1699215066808\/Almanac%20-%20I&amp;R%20Historical%20Timeline%20(1).pdf\">I&amp;R Historical Timeline<\/a>.\u201d n.d.; Initiative and Referendum Institute. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/history-us-direct-democracy\">The History of the Initiative and Referendum Process in the United States<\/a>.\u201d n.d. Table made by author.<\/em>\r\n<\/strong><\/caption>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>State<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Year Approved<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">South Dakota<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1898<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Utah<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1900<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oregon<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1902<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Montana<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1906<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oklahoma<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1907<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Missouri<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1908<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Maine<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1908<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Colorado<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1910<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arkansas<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1910<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">California<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1911<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arizona<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1911<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nebraska<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1912<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Idaho<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1912<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nevada<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1912<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Ohio<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1912<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Washington<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1912<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Michigan<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1913<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Mississippi<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1914<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">North Dakota<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1914<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Massachusetts<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1918<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Alaska<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1956<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Florida<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1968<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Wyoming<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1968<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Illinois<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1970<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Twenty of the twenty-four states that currently have the initiative added it between 1898 and 1918. Eighty-three percent of all the states with the initiative added it during that twenty-year window. Illinois was one of the last states to add the initiative in 1970. As previously described, Mississippi adopted the initiative for a second time in 1992, only to have the state supreme court rule it to be effectively impossible for citizens to gather sufficient signatures to get an initiative on the ballot.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Pittman, \u201c\u2018Democracy Dies Blow by Blow.\u2019\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> While some progress has been made in adding the initiative or other forms of direct democracy to additional states, politicians seem unlikely and unwilling to give voters the chance to participate in direct democracy. As succinctly articulated by a Texas Republican explaining his party\u2019s shift from supporting to opposing direct democracy in the state, \u201cIf you\u2019re out of government, you\u2019re in favor of initiatives. If you\u2019re in government, they become not so appealing.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Crary, \u201cUS States Spit.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n\r\n<h1 class=\"import-ah\">How Does the Initiative Process Work, and How Is It Different State by State?<\/h1>\r\n<p class=\"import-paft\">Having established that there is significant state variation in the existence of direct democracy across the fifty states, it is also worthwhile to dig deeper to examine further differences. Not all states utilize direct democracy at the same rate, and they have very different rules and regulations governing its use. In 1978, California voters approved Proposition 13 by almost a 2\u20131 margin, drastically limiting future property tax increases and requiring supermajority support for additional tax increases.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cCalifornia Proposition 13\u201d; Hayward, \u201cTax Revolt Turns 20\u201d; New, \u201cTax Revolt Turns 25\u201d; Drum, \u201cHappy 35th Birthday, Tax Revolt.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> This led many to call for a \u201ctaxpayer revolt,\u201d which sparked many similar initiatives and referendums across the country.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">As depicted in <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">Figure 7.7<\/span><\/span>, the last forty years have seen a significant growth in the number of ballot measures. However, the trend appears to be slowing down in the last few election cycles, as many states have passed legislation making it harder for initiatives to reach the ballot.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_285\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"535\"]<img class=\"wp-image-285\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.7.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"535\" height=\"312\" \/> <strong>Figure 7.7 - Number of Initiatives by Decade<br \/>Data Source: National Conference of State Legislatures. \u201cStatewide Ballot Measures Database.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/statewide-ballot-measures-database\">https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/statewide-ballot-measures-database<\/a>; Initiative and Referendum Institute. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/direct-democracy-data\">Direct Democracy Historical Database<\/a>.\u201d n.d.\u00a0Graph made by author.<\/strong>[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">While the number of initiatives has risen over the last half-century, the use of the initiative is uneven across the twenty-four states that feature this institution. The five states that most frequently utilize the initiative (California, Oregon, Colorado, Washington, and Arizona) account for 53 percent of all initiatives in our country\u2019s history. The top ten states account for more than 75 percent of all initiatives.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" cellpadding=\"0pt 5.4pt\"><caption><strong><em><span class=\"import-thn\">Table 7.3 - <\/span>Number of Initiatives, 1904\u20132024<\/em>\r\n<em><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\">Data Source:<\/span> National Conference of State Legislatures. \u201cStatewide Ballot Measures Database.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId138\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/statewide-ballot-measures-database\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/statewide-ballot-measures-database<\/span><\/a><\/span>. Table made by author.<\/em>\r\n<\/strong><\/caption>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>State<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Number of Initiatives<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">California<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">501<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oregon<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">440<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Colorado<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">397<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Washington<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">342<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arizona<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">209<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Missouri<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">206<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">North Dakota<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">205<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arkansas<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">186<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Massachusetts<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">153<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Montana<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">100<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oklahoma<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">99<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Ohio<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">97<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Florida<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">96<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Michigan<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">95<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">South Dakota<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">86<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Maine<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">81<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nevada<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">79<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nebraska<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">69<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Alaska<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">59<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Idaho<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">37<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Utah<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">23<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Mississippi<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">12<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Wyoming<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">7<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Illinois<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">In general, the states with the most use have the easiest time accessing it and are least hampered by the state legislature.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Bowler and Donovan, \u201cMeasuring the Effect,\u201d 345\u2013363.[\/footnote]<\/sup> Shaun Bowler and Todd Donovan created a six-point index for how difficult it is for an initiative to qualify for the ballot. Higher scores are associated with greater levels of difficulty. The general procedure for how the initiative process works is articulated in the following paragraphs with references made to Bowler and Donovan\u2019s index.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]The Council of State Governments, \u201cHow Ballot Measures Get on the Ballot\u201d; Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n\r\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" style=\"height: 925px;\" cellpadding=\"0pt 5.4pt\"><caption><strong><em><span class=\"import-thn\">Table 7.4 - <\/span>State Variation in Ballot Qualification and Legislative Insulation<\/em>\r\n<em><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\">Data Source:<\/span> Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. \u201cMeasuring the Effect of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives Are Created Equal.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/span> 4 (2004): 345\u2013363. Table made by author.<\/em>\r\n<\/strong><\/caption>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>State<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Qualification Difficulty Score<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Legislative Insulation Index<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oregon<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">0<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">California<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Colorado<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">North Dakota<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arkansas<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Ohio<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Michigan<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">South Dakota<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Idaho<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Utah<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arizona<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Washington<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oklahoma<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Montana<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Missouri<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Massachusetts<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">8<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nebraska<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Maine<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">8<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nevada<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">5<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Florida<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Illinois<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">5<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Alaska<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">5<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Mississippi<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">5<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">7<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">Wyoming<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\r\n<p class=\"import-td\">9<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The first item that is considered part of Bowler and Donovan\u2019s index is whether the state allows both statutory and constitutional initiatives (0) or only one of the two types of initiatives (1). As previously discussed, the last three states to add the initiative (Florida, Illinois, and Mississippi) only add constitutional, and not statutory, initiatives.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Once an idea is generated\u2014whether by active citizens, organized interest groups, or even the state legislature (in the instances of legislative referendums), a proposal is submitted to the appropriate state official for review. This preliminary filing includes draft language that supporters would like to see on the ballot.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]The Council of State Governments, \u201cHow Ballot Measures Get on the Ballot.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> In most states, two or more government officials or entities play a role in drafting the language that appears on the ballot and is distributed to voters. The most common elected officials are the state legislature (or some committee of the legislature), the attorney general, or the secretary of state.<\/p>\r\nFigure 7.8 - Responsibility for Ballot Language\r\nData Source: Boldt, A. \u201cDirect Democracy in the States: A 50-State Survey of the Journey to the Ballot.\u201d State Democracy Research Initiative, University of Wisconsin Law School. 2023. . Graph made by author.\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"823\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/07\/Figure-7.8.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"823\" height=\"591\" \/> <strong>Figure 7.8 - Responsibility for Ballot Language<br \/>Data Source: Boldt, A. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/statedemocracy.law.wisc.edu\/direct-democracy\/\">Direct Democracy in the States: A 50-State Survey of the Journey to the Ballot.<\/a>\u201d State Democracy Research Initiative, University of Wisconsin Law School. 2023. . Graph made by author.<\/strong>[\/caption]\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/07\/Figure-7.8.png\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Part of what the government reviews is whether the proposed policy is appropriate for the initiative. The second part of Bowler and Donovan\u2019s index is whether there are substantive <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">subject restrictions<\/strong><\/span>. Seven states (Alaska, Illinois, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, and Wyoming) have specific limits on the types of policies the initiative can and cannot address.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cSubject Restrictions for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> Some of these restrictions are making appropriations (dictating how state money will be spent), modifying judicial proceedings, or infringing upon rights or liberties spelled out in the state\u2019s constitution.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Sixteen states also include <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">single-subject rules<\/strong><\/span> as part of their initiative process.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cSingle-Subject Rule for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> This restriction limits initiatives to address a single policy area to prevent logrolling\u2014that is, preventing groups from combining initiatives together in order to garner additional support. For example, groups in Missouri interested in raising the minimum wage and legalizing recreational marijuana would not be permitted to combine forces in a single initiative. Voters must consider each initiative on its own merit.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">As part of the official review, the appropriate government representative drafts an official title and the summary language that would appear on the ballot. The process of drafting language can be contentious and litigious (i.e., end up being the subject of a lawsuit). Who is writing the ballot language often shapes whether the perspective is sympathetic to supporters or opponents, whether it is neutral, and how accessible or understandable the language is for the average voter.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Fuller, \u201cWhy Are Ballot Measures So Darn Confusing?\u201d; Lakoff, \u201cWhy Are Many Ballot Measures So Confusing?\u201d; Elmendorf and Spencer, \u201cAre Ballot Titles Biased?,\u201d 511\u2013549.[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">In recent years, Ballotpedia has started to assess the average grade level voters would need to possess in order to fully understand ballot titles and language.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cBallot Measure Readability Scores, 2022.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> The average reading level to understand the title (which averages 57 words) between 2017 and 2022 is eighteen (two years of postgraduate education). The average reading level to understand the summary on the ballot (which averages 193 words) is sixteen (a senior in college). As of the 2020 Census, only 38 percent of people over the age of twenty-five possess at least a bachelor\u2019s degree. While citizens with a college degree are more likely to vote than adults without a college degree and are overrepresented among regular voters, a substantial number of voters have no college degree.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]United States Census Bureau, \u201cCensus Bureau Releases\u201d; Hartig et al., \u201cRepublican Gains.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"670\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/07\/Ballot-Measure-Readability.png\" alt=\"Bar graph comparing the readability of average title and average summary, in grade levels, over time. Generally, title grade levels are higher than summary grade levels.\" width=\"670\" height=\"389\" \/> <strong>Figure 7.9 -Ballot Measure Readability<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ballot_measure_readability_scores,_2022#Historical_readability_scores\">Ballot Measure Readability Scores, 2022<\/a>.\u201d n.d. Graph made by author.<\/strong>[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-fig\">\u00a0Once supporters have filed their proposed initiative, it has been reviewed by the appropriate government source, and the formal ballot title and summary are prepared, the next step in the process is collecting signatures to ensure that the measure has enough support to qualify for the ballot. The remaining four components of Bowler and Donovan\u2019s ballot access index are (1) whether the length of time supporters have to collect signatures is limited, (2) whether signatures must adhere to geographic distribution requirements, (3) whether the proportion of signatures required is at least 7 percent, and (4) whether the proportion of signatures required is more than 10 percent.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Of the twenty-four states that possess the initiative, fourteen of them have a <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">signature distribution requirement<\/strong><\/span>.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cSignature Distribution Requirements.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> With the exception of Colorado, four of the five states with the most initiatives over the last century do not require signatures to come from any specific geography within the state. This makes it easier for signature gatherers to concentrate on dense, urban populations or communities where support is more readily available. Florida, Missouri, Mississippi, and Nevada base their signature requirements on congressional districts throughout the state. As previously mentioned, Mississippi\u2019s initiative is currently in flux, since the signature requirement warrants signatures from <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">five<\/em><\/span> congressional districts even though the state only has <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">four<\/em><\/span> since redistricting after the 2020 Census. Arkansas, Massachusetts, Nebraska, Ohio, and Wyoming utilize counties for the geographic requirement. The remaining five states (Alaska, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, and Utah) require signatures to be dispersed throughout state legislative districts. Maryland and New Mexico have signature requirements for their popular referendum but do not have the initiative in their states.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_289\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"674\"]<img class=\"wp-image-289 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.10.jpg\" alt=\"United States map showing which states have a geographic signature requirement (14 states), no geographic signature requirement (10 states), or no relevant iniatives (26 states).\" width=\"674\" height=\"472\" \/> <strong>Figure 7.10 - Signature Requirements by State<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Signature_distribution_requirements_for_ballot_initiatives\">Signature Distribution Requirements for Ballot Initiatives<\/a>.\u201d n.d. Map made by author.<\/strong>[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Increasing the signature distribution requirements is a common way that state governments attempt to limit the ability of citizens to utilize the initiative. In 2023, Ohio voters controversially were asked to consider Issue 1, which would have doubled the geographic requirement from half (44) to all (88) counties. It also would have eliminated the \u201ccure period,\u201d where supporters have ten days to submit additional signatures if their initial submission fails to meet the signature and geographic distribution requirements. Voters rejected this measure with 57 percent of the vote.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cOhio Issue 1, 60% Vote.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The sheer volume of signatures required, especially if states have high thresholds for geographic distributions, often leaves supporters of initiatives relying on paid signature gatherers. This is even more pronounced depending on the window in which supporters can collect signatures, which ranges from ninety days to an unlimited amount of time.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cLength of Signature Gathering.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> Colorado attempted to limit the use of paid signature gatherers, but this was struck down in the US Supreme Court case <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Meyer v. Grant<\/em><\/span> for violating the First Amendment\u2019s protection of political speech.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Oyez, \u201cMeyer v. Grant.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">As a result, many organized interest groups, like the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId142\" href=\"https:\/\/ballot.org\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">Ballot Initiative Strategy Center<\/span><\/a><\/span> (BISC), exist to provide training, strategic advice, and assistance in utilizing paid signature gatherers. While states are unable to prevent signature gatherers from being paid, states do have considerable variation as to whether the signature gatherers must be state residents, whether they can be paid per signature, or whether they can impose other requirements on signature gatherers.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cLaws Governing Ballot Initiative.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Once the signatures are submitted and the state government reviews them to ensure that they are legitimate and meet any necessary distribution requirements, the next step in the process is determining when voters will get a chance to weigh in on the initiative. Some states require that ballot initiatives be placed on the ballot for the next general election, whereas other states are able to place initiatives on the ballot during either a primary or a special election.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> As voter turnout is higher in general elections compared to primary or special elections and higher in presidential elections compared to midterm elections, the decision of when to allow voters the opportunity to vote is often a strategic choice.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Prior to the election, many states are required by law to provide additional information about any initiatives and referendums to voters. Of the twenty-four states that utilize the initiative, fifteen of them are required by law to either send a pamphlet with information about the initiatives to registered voters, publicly display the pamphlet, or make it available online.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Finally, voters get a chance to weigh in and vote in favor of or in opposition to the initiative. Most elections in the United States follow the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">plurality rule<\/strong><\/span>, meaning whichever candidate receives the most votes wins the election. This \u201cfirst past the post\u201d framework allows a candidate to win the election without receiving more than 50 percent of the vote. Since voters are given the choice to vote yes or no on an initiative, rather than voting on two or more candidates, direct democracy largely relies on <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">majority rule<\/strong><\/span>: Whichever outcome receives 50 percent plus one vote is the winner.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">However, some states utilize <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">supermajority <\/strong><strong class=\"import-b\">rule<\/strong><\/span>, some numerical requirement above a majority, to pass ballot measures.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cSupermajority Requirements.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> These thresholds are frequently for approving constitutional amendments (whether initiated by citizens or the state legislature) but also for specific policy areas like taxation. In 2022, Arizona voters approved Proposition 132, which increased the majority requirement from a simple majority to 60 percent in order to approve any future tax increases. Another way that states require more than a simple majority to pass a ballot measure is by utilizing a different denominator to measure turnout. Some states do not simply use whether an initiative received 50 percent plus one vote of all votes cast in the given race but rather utilize the total number of registered voters in the state, the total number of votes cast for the highest office, or some other predetermined number. Proponents of these higher thresholds point to the fact that they prevent voters from abstaining on ballot questions and ensure that election outcomes reflect the preferences of all state voters, not just those who cast a ballot on a given question.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Given the states previously mentioned, it is imperative to highlight how much the initiative process varies from state to state. No two states are completely alike when it comes to how citizens are able to utilize the initiative or other forms of direct democracy. The process, however, surely matters. State differences in the rules governing direct democracy are part of the reason why a state like Wyoming has only seven initiatives in the last one hundred years while states like Oregon and California have more than one thousand combined.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h1 class=\"import-ah\">What Are the Arguments in Favor and Opposed to Direct Democracy?<\/h1>\r\n<p class=\"import-paft\">Political scientists frequently debate the merits and shortcomings of direct democracy.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Dyck, \u201cNew Directions,\u201d 109\u2013128; Smith and Tolbert, \u201cInstrumental and Educative Effects,\u201d 416\u2013445; Lupia and Matsusaka, \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 463\u2013482.[\/footnote]<\/sup> In this section, some of the more prominent arguments in favor of and opposed to the initiative will be considered.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The first major argument in favor of direct democracy is that it helps overcome the \u201csins of omission\u201d of representative democracy.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Donovan, Smith, Osborn, and Mooney et al., State and Local Politics.[\/footnote]<\/sup> Elected officials may be unwilling or unable to turn the public opinion preferences of their constituents into public policy. Given the polarization and gridlock at the national level, many activists turn their attention to the states (and the initiative) to pursue policy goals.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Phillips, \u201cDoes the Citizen Initiative Weaken?,\u201d 127\u2013149; Ferraiolo, \u201cState Policy Activism,\u201d 378\u2013402; Lacombe and Boehmke, \u201cInitiative Process,\u201d 286\u2013305; Hicks, \u201cInitiatives,\u201d 471\u2013494; Cummins, \u201cAre Initiatives an End-Run,\u201d 443\u2013462.[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">For example, Republicans have a trifecta, where they control both chambers of the state legislature and the governorship, in twenty-three states. Voters in these states elect and reelect Republicans to control all levels of government. However, when given the opportunity to vote for individual policies, voters in these Republican-controlled states have used the initiative to raise the minimum wage, legalize recreational and medicinal marijuana, expand Medicaid, and protect abortion rights.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Pott, \u201cWhy Republican Voters Support\u201d; Simonovits, Guess, and Nagler et al., \u201cResponsiveness Without Representation,\u201d 401\u2013410; Vollers, \u201cDespite GOP Headwinds.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_290\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"681\"]<img class=\"wp-image-290 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.11.jpg\" alt=\"United States map showing which states have Republican trifectas (23 states), Democratic trifectas (17 states), or divided governments (10 states).\" width=\"681\" height=\"474\" \/> <strong>Figure 7.11 - Control of State Government by State<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201cState Government Trifectas.\u201d 2024. <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/State_government_trifectas\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/State_government_trifectas.<\/a> Map made by author.<\/strong>[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Voters via the initiative are also more likely than the elected branches of government to implement \u201cgood government\u201d reforms. For example, nineteen of the twenty-one states that adopted term limits for state legislators during the 1990s and 2000s did so via the initiative.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Bowler and Donovan, Limits of Electoral Reform.[\/footnote]<\/sup> Elected officials are less likely to vote themselves out of the job, but citizens are more than willing to do so.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The second major argument in favor of direct democracy is similar to the \u201csins of omission\u201d in that the presence of the initiative, referendum, and recall acts as a (pardon the expression) \u201cgun behind the door\u201d and forces the elected branches to be more responsive. The rapid advancement of marijuana legislation at the state level is a perfect example. States first utilized the initiative to adopt medicinal marijuana policies and programs before expanding into recreational marijuana in both Republican and Democratic states.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Mallinson and Hannah, \u201cPolicy and Political Learning,\u201d 344\u2013369; Hannah and Mallinson, \u201cDefiant Innovation,\u201d 402\u2013423.[\/footnote]<\/sup> Where the initiative was not utilized, it often spurred legislatures to act. While some studies disagree as to the extent that the mere presence of the initiative is associated with greater responsiveness, others point to evidence that suggests that the threat of the initiative forces legislators to act, leads policy to be more closely aligned with public opinion, and leads to the initiative being used more frequently only when the preferences of voters and elected officials diverge.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Lascher, Hagen, and Rochlin et al., \u201cGun Behind the Door?,\u201d 760\u2013775; Lewis, Schneider, and Jacoby et al., \u201cImpact of Direct Democracy,\u201d 531\u2013538; Boehmke, Osborn, and Schilling et al., \u201cPivotal Politics,\u201d 665\u2013677; Simonovits, Guess, and Nagler et al., \u201cResponsiveness Without Representation,\u201d 401\u2013410.[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The initiative plays an important role in agenda setting and shaping the contours of races between candidates for office.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Nicholson, Voting the Agenda; Smith and Tolbert, Educated by Initiative; Smith and Tolbert, \u201cInstrumental and Educative Effects,\u201d 416\u2013445.[\/footnote]<\/sup> After the Supreme Court struck down <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Roe v. Wade<\/em><\/span> and a woman\u2019s right to have an abortion in <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Dobbs v. Jackson<\/em><\/span>, many states utilized the initiative to enshrine abortion rights at the state level. Ten states had abortion-related measures on their ballot in the November 2024 general election.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201c2023 and 2024 Abortion-Related Ballot Measures.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> Candidates often have to communicate with voters about where they stand on these initiatives. During the 2022 and 2024 cycles, many Republican candidates for office struggled with how to talk about the issue, balancing between downplaying, adjusting, or doubling down on their positions.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Rovner, \u201cRepublican Candidates Are Downplaying Abortion\u201d; Rosenbaum, \u201cAbortion Rights on the Ballot\u201d; Steck et al., \u201cRepublican Candidates Downplay.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">One of the primary arguments against direct democracy is concerns about voter competence. To put it bluntly, are voters \u201cdumber than chimps?\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Lupia, \u201cDumber Than Chimps?\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> While political scientist V. O. Key famously said, \u201cVoters are not fools,\u201d it is dubious to suspect that most voters understand the substance of all ballot measures.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Key, Responsible Electorate.[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">One of the reasons the founding fathers pursued representative democracy rather than democracy was their belief that elected officials would be better able to make decisions to promote the public good rather than just make self-serving decisions. Voters are less likely to be aware or knowledgeable of the various initiatives or referendums on the ballot, let alone make an informed decision.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Nicholson, Voting the Agenda; Barth, Burnett, and Parry et al., \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 1015\u20131034.[\/footnote]<\/sup> Most voters need to rely on elite cues or endorsements from trusted interested groups, politicians, and political parties to inform how they believe they should vote on a ballot measure.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Smith and Tolbert, Educated by Initiative; Lupia and Matsusaka, \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 463\u2013482.[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">When voters are uninformed heading to the polls or are unable to understand a ballot measure, they are more likely to default and vote no to preserve the status quo<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Dyck and Pearson-Merkowitz, \u201cBallot Initiatives,\u201d 180\u2013207.[\/footnote]<\/sup>\u2014that is, when they decide to cast a vote at all. Voters experience \u201c<span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">voter fatigue<\/strong><\/span>\u201d and \u201c<span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">roll-off<\/strong><\/span>\u201d if the ballot is too long or they are uninformed about the various ballot measures facing them.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Nicholson, \u201cPolitical Environment,\u201d 403\u2013410; Wattenberg, McAllister, and Salvanto et al., \u201cHow Voting Is lLike Taking an SAT Test\u201d; Bowler and Donovan, Demanding Choices.[\/footnote]<\/sup> During the 2022 November general election, more voters cast a ballot for the highest office (whether that is a race for US Senate, governor, or some other office) than for any ballot measure. The median difference in the number of votes between the two types of contests was 70,936.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_291\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"818\"]<img class=\"wp-image-291 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.12.jpg\" alt=\"Bar graph showing the difference in number of votes cast between highest office and ballot measure, with a sample of 21 states. Differences range from nearly zero to over 600,000.\" width=\"818\" height=\"478\" \/> <strong>Figure 7.12 - Roll-Off Voting<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201c2022 Ballot Measure Election Results.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2022_ballot_measure_election_results#November_8\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2022_ballot_measure_election_results#November_8<\/a>; US Elections Project. \u201c2022 General Election.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.electproject.org\/2022g\">https:\/\/www.electproject.org\/2022g<\/a>. Graph made by author.<\/strong>[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Even if voters are aware of and understand the ballot measures before them in any given election, which is often difficult given that the writing of official language is often intended to confuse, they may not be able to handle democracy \u00e0 la carte. That is, by voting on some (but not all) legislation, citizens may send conflicting messages to their elected officials and produce unintended challenges. Voters, many of whom are symbolically conservative but operationally liberal, can hamstring elected officials by limiting the amount of revenue the government is able to collect while simultaneously approving new spending priorities.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Piper, \u201cCalifornia\u2019s Ballot Initiative System\u201d; Grossman and Hopkins, Asymmetric Politics.[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The second major critique of direct democracy is, What if a majority of voters actually gets what they want? If the majority wins, who loses?<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">First, many express concerns that direct democracy has long abandoned the populist and progressive aims of those who established the institution.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Gerber, Populist Paradox; Ellis, Democratic Delusions; Sabato, Larson, and Ernst et al., Dangerous Democracy?[\/footnote]<\/sup> The Supreme Court has repeatedly struck down attempts to regulate the amount of money spent supporting and opposing initiatives as a protection of the First Amendment.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cI&amp;R Historical Timeline.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> As a result, interest groups and wealthy donors invest heavily, spending more than $1.24 billion and $1.10 billion in campaign contributions across more than one hundred different statewide ballot measures in the 2020 and 2022 elections, respectively.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Ballotpedia, \u201cBallot Measure Campaign Finance, 2022.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The pure majoritarian nature of direct democracy also poses the threat of \u201ctyranny of the majority.\u201d Without many of the features of representative democracy (e.g., separation of powers, checks and balances, federalism), there is little to stop majorities from imposing their will on minorities. Moreover, behind the anonymity of a secret ballot compared to an open roll-call vote on the floor of the state legislature, it is easier for the majority to impose policies and restrict the civil rights of minorities\u2014whether they be rooted in terms of gender, racial or ethnic group, religious identity, or sexual orientation.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Gamble, \u201cPutting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote,\u201d 245\u2013269; Lewis, Direct Democracy and Minority Rights; Haider-Markel, Querze, and Lindman et al., \u201cLose, Win, or Draw?,\u201d 304\u2013314; Hajnal, Gerber, and Louch et al., \u201cMinorities and Direct Legislation,\u201d 154\u2013177.[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">That is not to say that these minority groups lose on every ballot measure. When a minority group is the target of a ballot measure, they generally find themselves outnumbered. Over the last thirty years, states have successfully passed ballot measures that ban same-sex marriage, implement anti\u2013affirmative action proposals, restrict the rights of immigrants, and so on. However, on initiatives or referendums where policy preferences cut across demographic groups, members of the majority and historically oppressed or vulnerable groups win at similar rates.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Hajnal, Gerber, and Louch et al., \u201cMinorities and Direct Legislation,\u201d 154\u2013177.[\/footnote]<\/sup> As a result, it is argued that direct democracy works for \u201cthe many rather than the few.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Matsusaka, For the Many or the Few.[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The promise of direct or participatory democracy is that it promotes advantages even beyond the direct or instrumental benefits of the policies passed by the citizens.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Pateman, Participation and Democratic Theory; Barber, Strong Democracy.[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Living in a state with direct democracy is associated with all sorts of characteristics and virtues associated with democratic citizenship.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Bowler and Donovan, \u201cDemocracy, Institutions, and Attitudes,\u201d 371\u2013390; Smith and Tolbert, Educated by Initiative. But see Dyck and Lascher, Initiatives Without Engagement; Bernhard, \u201cDoes Direct Democracy Increase Civic Virtues?\u201d; Biggers, Morality at the Ballot.[\/footnote]<\/sup> This includes higher levels of political knowledge and political efficacy, or the belief that citizens can enact meaningful change. Citizens living in states with direct democratic institutions also report higher levels of personal trust and trust in government. The health or quality of democracy also is theoretically higher, as citizens participate and vote in greater numbers in states with direct democracy.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Citizens living in states with direct democracy report being happier and more satisfied with their lives.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Radcliff and Shufeldt, \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 1405\u20131423.[\/footnote]<\/sup> Arguably, more important as a democratic institution, the vast majority of citizens support direct democracy. A majority of Americans agree with statements like \u201cA democratic system where citizens, not elected officials, vote directly on major national issues to decide what becomes law would be a good way of governing the country\u201d or \u201cVoters should have the right to propose and pass laws through a citizen initiative process.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Wike et al., \u201cRepresentative Democracy\u201d; Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, \u201c11-State Ballot Initiative.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">While political scientists continue to weigh the benefits and shortcomings of direct democracy, these competing arguments have real-world consequences.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Donovan, \u201cPromise and Perils\u201d; Bowler and Donovan, \u201cEnduring Questions.\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup> What citizens want, however, appears to be increasingly in conflict with their state government. Whether through legislation being considered by state legislatures or legislative referendums placed in front of voters, many states are attempting to roll back and make direct democracy more difficult to utilize.<sup class=\"import-enref\">[footnote]Carter, Chapman, and Comella et al., \u201cPoliticians Take Aim\u201d; Ballotpedia, \u201cDifficulty Analysis\u201d; Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy\u201d; Matsusaka, \u201cDirect Democracy Backsliding?\u201d[\/footnote]<\/sup><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">For these states, they have direct democracy if they can keep it.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--key-takeaways\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">\r\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Bibliography<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/header>\r\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballot Initiative Strategy Center. \u201c11-State Ballot Initiative Voter Attitudes Research.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId146\" href=\"https:\/\/ballot.org\/11-state-ballot-initiative-voter-attitudes-research\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballot.org\/11-state-ballot-initiative-voter-attitudes-research\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cAbortion on the Ballot.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId147\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Abortion_on_the_ballot\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Abortion_on_the_ballot#By_year<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cBallot Measure Campaign Finance, 2022.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId148\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ballot_measure_campaign_finance,_2022\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ballot_measure_campaign_finance,_2022<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cBallot Measure Readability Scores, 2022.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId149\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ballot_measure_readability_scores,_2022\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ballot_measure_readability_scores,_2022#Historical_readability_s<\/span><span class=\"import-url\">cores<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cCalifornia Proposition 13, Tax Limitations Initiative (June 1978).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId150\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/California_Proposition_13,_Tax_Limitations_Initiative_(June_1978)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/California_Proposition_13,_Tax_Limitations_Initiative_(June_1978)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cConstitutional Amendment.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId151\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Constitutional_amendment\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Constitutional_amendment#<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cDifficulty Analysis of Changes to Laws Governing Ballot Measures.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId152\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Difficulty_analysis_of_changes_to_laws_governing_ballot_measures\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Difficulty_analysis_of_changes_to_laws_governing_ballot_measure<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cGavin Newsom Recall, Governor of California (2019\u20132021).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId153\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Gavin_Newsom_recall,_Governor_of_California_(2019-2021)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Gavin_Newsom_recall,_Governor_of_California_(2019-2021)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cGray Davis Recall, Governor of California (2003).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId154\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Gray_Davis_recall,_Governor_of_California_(2003)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Gray_Davis_recall,_Governor_of_California_(2003)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cLaws Governing Ballot Initiative Signature Gatherers.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId155\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Laws_governing_ballot_initiative_signature_gatherers\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Laws_governing_ballot_initiative_signature_gatherers<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cLength of Signature Gathering Periods for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId156\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Length_of_signature_gathering_periods_for_ballot_initiatives\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Length_of_signature_gathering_periods_for_ballot_initiatives<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cList of Veto Referendum Ballot Measures.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId157\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/List_of_veto_referendum_ballot_measures\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/List_of_veto_referendum_ballot_measures<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cOhio Issue 1, 60% Vote Requirement to Approve Constitutional Amendments Measure (2023).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId158\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ohio_Issue_1,_60%25_Vote_Requirement_to_Approve_Constitutional_Amendments_Measure_(2023)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ohio_Issue_1,_60%_Vote_Requirement_to_Approve_Constitutional_Amendments_Measure_(2023)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cOhio Issue 1, Right to Make Reproductive Decisions Including Abortion Initiative (2023).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId159\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ohio_Issue_1,_Right_to_Make_Reproductive_Decisions_Including_Abortion_Initiative_(2023)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ohio_Issue_1,_Right_to_Make_Reproductive_Decisions_Including_Abortion_Initiative_(2023)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cRecall Overview.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId160\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Recall_overview\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Recall_overview<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cScott Walker Recall, Wisconsin (2011\u20132012).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId161\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Scott_Walker_recall,_Wisconsin_(2011-2012)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Scott_Walker_recall,_Wisconsin_(2011-2012)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cSignature Distribution Requirements for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId162\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Signature_distribution_requirements_for_ballot_initiatives\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Signature_distribution_requirements_for_ballot_initiatives<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cSingle-Subject Rule for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId163\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Single-subject_rule_for_ballot_initiatives\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Single-subject_rule_for_ballot_initiatives<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cSubject Restrictions for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId164\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Subject_restrictions_for_ballot_initiatives\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Subject_restrictions_for_ballot_initiatives<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cSupermajority Requirements for Ballot Measures.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Supermajority_requirements_for_ballot_measures\"><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Supermajority_requirements_for_ballot_measures<\/span><\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201c2023 and 2024 Abortion-Related Ballot Measures.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId165\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2023_and_2024_abortion-related_ballot_measures\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2023_and_2024_abortion-related_ballot_measures<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201c2024 Ballot Measures.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId166\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2024_ballot_measures\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2024_ballot_measures<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Barber, B. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age<\/em><\/span>. University of California Press, 2003.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Barth, J., C. Burnett., and J. Parry. \u201cDirect Democracy, Educative Effects, and the (Mis)Measurement of Ballot Measure Awareness.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Political Behavior<\/em><\/span> 42 (2020): 1015\u20131034.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Beauchamp, Z. \u201cSen. Mike Lee\u2019s Tweets Against \u2018Democracy,\u2019 Explained.\u201d Vox, 2020. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId167\" href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/policy-and-politics\/21507713\/mike-lee-democracy-republic-trump-2020\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.vox.com\/policy-and-politics\/21507713\/mike-lee-democracy-republic-trump-2020<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bernhard, L. \u201cDoes Direct Democracy Increase Civic Virtues? A Systematic Literature Review.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Frontiers in Political Science<\/em><\/span> 6 (2024): 1287330.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Biggers, D. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Morality at the Ballot: Direct Democracy and Political Engagement in the United States<\/em><\/span>. Cambridge University Press, 2014.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Boehmke, F., T. Osborn, and E. Schilling. \u201cPivotal Politics and Initiative Use in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Political Research Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 68 (2015): 665\u2013677.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Boldt, A. \u201cDirect Democracy in the States: A 50-State Survey of the Journey to the Ballot.\u201d State Democracy Research Initiative, University of Wisconsin Law School, 2023. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId168\" href=\"https:\/\/statedemocracy.law.wisc.edu\/direct-democracy\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/statedemocracy.law.wisc.edu\/direct-democracy\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy<\/em><\/span>. University of Michigan Press, 1998.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. \u201cDemocracy, Institutions, and Attitudes About Citizen Influence on Government.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">British Journal of Political Science<\/em><\/span> 32 (2002): 371\u2013390.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. \u201cEnduring Questions and Unsatisfactory Answers About Direct Democracy.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics<\/em><\/span>. Oxford University Press, 2021.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The Limits of Electoral Reform<\/em><\/span>. Oxford University Press, 2013.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. \u201cMeasuring the Effect of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives Are Created Equal.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 4 (2004), 345\u2013363.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bryan, F. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How It Works<\/em><\/span>. University of Chicago Press, 2004.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Carter, S., A. Chapman, and A. Comella. \u201cPoliticians Take Aim at Ballot Initiatives.\u201d Brennan Center for Justice, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId169\" href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/research-reports\/politicians-take-aim-ballot-initiatives\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/research-reports\/politicians-take-aim-ballot-initiatives<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Churchill, W. \u201cThe Worst Form of Government.\u201d International Churchill Society, 2016. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId170\" href=\"https:\/\/winstonchurchill.org\/resources\/quotes\/the-worst-form-of-government\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/winstonchurchill.org\/resources\/quotes\/the-worst-form-of-government\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Council of State Governments. \u201cHow Ballot Measures Get on the Ballot.\u201d 2023. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId171\" href=\"https:\/\/www.csg.org\/2023\/11\/09\/how-ballot-measures-get-on-the-ballot\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.csg.org\/2023\/11\/09\/how-ballot-measures-get-on-the-ballot\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Crary, D. \u201cUS States Spit on Allowing Citizen Ballot Initiatives.\u201d Associated Press, 2018. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId172\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/efb5b289cfb544968c5b79c2d0be20f7\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/efb5b289cfb544968c5b79c2d0be20f7<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Cummins, J. \u201cAre Initiatives an End-Run Around the Legislative Process? Divided Government and Voter Support for California Initiatives.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 23 (2023): 443\u2013462.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Dave Leip\u2019s Atlas of US Elections. \u201c1892 Presidential General Election Results.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId173\" href=\"https:\/\/uselectionatlas.org\/RESULTS\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/uselectionatlas.org\/RESULTS\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Dobski, B. \u201cAmerica Is a Republic, Not a Democracy.\u201d Heritage Foundation, 2020. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId174\" href=\"https:\/\/www.heritage.org\/american-founders\/report\/america-republic-not-democracy\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.heritage.org\/american-founders\/report\/america-republic-not-democracy<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Donovan, T. \u201cThe Promise and Perils of Direct Democracy: An Introduction.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Politics and Governance<\/em><\/span> 7 (2019). <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17645\/pag.v7i2.2267<\/span><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Donovan, T., D. Smith, T. Osborn, and C. Mooney. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State and Local Politics: Institutions and Reform<\/em><\/span>. 4th ed. Cengage, 2015.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Drum, K. \u201cHappy 35th Birthday, Tax Revolt! Thanks for Destroying California.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Mother Jones<\/em><\/span>, 2013. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId175\" href=\"https:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/kevin-drum\/2013\/06\/tax-revolt-35th-anniversary-prop-13-california\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/kevin-drum\/2013\/06\/tax-revolt-35th-anniversary-prop-13-california\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Dyck, J. \u201cNew Directions for Empirical Studies of Direct Democracy.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Chapman Law Review<\/em><\/span> 19 (2015): 109\u2013128.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Dyck, J., and E. Lascher. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Initiatives Without Engagement: A Realistic Appraisal of Direct Democracy\u2019s Secondary Effects<\/em><\/span>. University of Michigan Press, 2019.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Dyck, J., and S. Pearson-Merkowitz. \u201cBallot Initiatives and Status Quo Bias.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 19 (2019): 180\u2013207.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ellis, R. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America<\/em><\/span>. University Press of Kansas, 2002.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Elmendorf, C., and D. Spencer. \u201cAre Ballot Titles Biased? Partisanship in California\u2019s Supervision of Direct Democracy.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">UC Irvine Law Review<\/em><\/span> 3 (2013): 511\u2013549.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Elvin, R. \u201cIs America a Democracy or a Republic? Yes, It Is.\u201d National Public Radio, 2022. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId176\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2022\/09\/10\/1122089076\/is-america-a-democracy-or-a-republic-yes-it-is\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2022\/09\/10\/1122089076\/is-america-a-democracy-or-a-republic-yes-it-is<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d 2021. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId177\" href=\"https:\/\/www.eda.admin.ch\/aboutswitzerland\/en\/home\/politik-geschichte\/politisches-system\/direkte-demokratie.html\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.eda.admin.ch\/aboutswitzerland\/en\/home\/politik-geschichte\/politisches-system\/direkte-demokratie.html#<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ferraiolo, K. \u201cState Policy Activism via Direct Democracy in Response to Federal Partisan Polarization.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Publius: The Journal of Federalism<\/em><\/span> 47 (2017): 378\u2013402.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Fuller, J. \u201cWhy Are Ballot Measures So Darn Confusing? Because They Are Supposed to Be.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The Washington Post<\/em><\/span>, 2014. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId178\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/the-fix\/wp\/2014\/08\/05\/why-are-ballot-measures-so-darn-confusing-because-they-are-supposed-to-be\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/the-fix\/wp\/2014\/08\/05\/why-are-ballot-measures-so-darn-confusing-because-they-are-supposed-to-be\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Gamble, B. \u201cPutting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">American Journal of Political Science<\/em><\/span> 41 (1997): 245\u2013269.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Gerber, E. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Democracy<\/em><\/span>. Princeton University Press, 2011.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Grossman, M., and D. Hopkins. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats<\/em><\/span>. Oxford University Press, 2016.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Guttmacher Institute. \u201cState Bans on Abortion Through Pregnancy.\u201d 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId179\" href=\"https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/state-policy\/explore\/state-policies-abortion-bans\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/state-policy\/explore\/state-policies-abortion-bans<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Haider-Markel, D., A. Querze, and K. Lindman. \u201cLose, Win, or Draw? A Reexamination of Direct Democracy and Minority Rights.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Political Research Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 60 (2007): 304\u2013314.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hajnal, Z., E. Gerber, and H. Louch. \u201cMinorities and Direct Legislation: Evidence from California Ballot Proposition Elections.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Journal of Politics<\/em><\/span> 64 (2002): 154\u2013177.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hamilton, A., J. Madison., J. Jay, C. Rossiter, and C. Kessler. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The Federalist Papers<\/em><\/span>. Mentor, 1999.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hannah, A. L., and D. Mallinson. \u201cDefiant Innovation: The Adoption of Medical Marijuana Laws in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Policy Studies Journal<\/em><\/span> 46, no. 2 (2018): 402\u2013423.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hartig, H., A. Daniller, S. Keeter., and T. Van Green. \u201cRepublican Gains in 2022 Midterms Driven Mostly by Turnout Advantage.\u201d Pew Research Center, 2023. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId180\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/politics\/2023\/07\/12\/republican-gains-in-2022-midterms-driven-mostly-by-turnout-advantage\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/politics\/2023\/07\/12\/republican-gains-in-2022-midterms-driven-mostly-by-turnout-advantage\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hayward, S. \u201cThe Tax Revolt Turns 20.\u201d Hoover Institution, 1998. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId181\" href=\"https:\/\/www.hoover.org\/research\/tax-revolt-turns-20\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.hoover.org\/research\/tax-revolt-turns-20<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hicks, W. \u201cInitiatives Within Representative Government: Political Competition and Initiative Use in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 21 (2021): 471\u2013494.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Initiative and Referendum Institute. \u201cThe History of the Initiative and Referendum Process in the United States.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId182\" href=\"https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/history-us-direct-democracy\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/history-us-direct-democracy<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Initiative and Referendum Institute. \u201cI&amp;R Historical Timeline.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId183\" href=\"https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/64fb2a824bc4a564c732b324\/t\/6547f6da992d3b25ee06bbae\/1699215066808\/Almanac - I&amp;R Historical Timeline (1).pdf\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/64fb2a824bc4a564c732b324\/t\/6547f6da992d3b25ee06bbae\/1699215066808\/Almanac - I&amp;R Historical Timeline (1).pdf<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Keating, J. 2020. \u201cThe Real Reason Why Republicans Keep Saying \u2018We\u2019re a Republic, Not a Democracy.\u2019\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Slate<\/em><\/span>, 2020. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId184\" href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/news-and-politics\/2020\/10\/republic-democracy-mike-lee-astra-taylor.html\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/slate.com\/news-and-politics\/2020\/10\/republic-democracy-mike-lee-astra-taylor.html<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Key, V. O. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936\u20131960<\/em><\/span>. Harvard University Press, 1966.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lacombe, S., and F. Boehmke. \u201cThe Initiative Process and Policy Innovation in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 21 (2021): 286\u2013305.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lakoff, G. \u201cWhy Are Many Ballot Measures So Confusing?\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The New York Times<\/em><\/span>, 2016. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId185\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/projects\/cp\/opinion\/election-night-2016\/why-are-many-ballot-measures-so-confusingly-worded\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/projects\/cp\/opinion\/election-night-2016\/why-are-many-ballot-measures-so-confusingly-worded<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lascher, E., M. Hagen, and S. Rochlin. \u201cGun Behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies, and Public Opinion.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Journal of Politics<\/em><\/span> 58 (1996): 760\u2013775.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lewis, D. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: A Critical Assessment of the Tyranny of the Majority in the American States<\/em><\/span>. Routledge, 2012.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lewis, D., S. Schneider, and W. Jacoby. \u201cThe Impact of Direct Democracy on State Spending Priorities.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Electoral Studies<\/em><\/span> 40 (2015): 531\u2013538.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lupia, A. \u201cDumber Than Chimps? An Assessment of Direct Democracy Voters.\u201d In <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Dangerous Democracy? The Battle over Ballot Initiatives in America<\/em><\/span>, edited by L. Sabato, B. Larson, and H. R. Ernst, 66\u201370. Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2001.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lupia, A., and J. Matsusaka. \u201cDirect Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Annual Review of Political Science<\/em><\/span> 7 (2004): 463\u2013482.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Mallinson, D., and A. L. Hannah. \u201cPolicy and Political Learning: The Development of Medical Marijuana Policies in the States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Publius: The Journal of Federalism<\/em><\/span> 50, no. 3 (2020): 344\u2013369.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Matsusaka, J. \u201cDirect Democracy Backsliding? Quantifying the Prevalence and Investing Causes 1960\u20132022.\u201d Initiative and Referendum Institute, 2023. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId186\" href=\"https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/research-on-direct-democracy\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/research-on-direct-democracy<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Matsusaka, J. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy<\/em><\/span>. University of Chicago Press, 2004.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Miller, J. \u201c\u2018A Republic If You Can Keep It\u2019: Elizabeth Willing Powel, Benjamin Franklin, and the James McHenry Journal.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Library of Congress Blogs<\/em><\/span>, 2022. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId187\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.loc.gov\/manuscripts\/2022\/01\/a-republic-if-you-can-keep-it-elizabeth-willing-powel-benjamin-franklin-and-the-james-mchenry-journal\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/blogs.loc.gov\/manuscripts\/2022\/01\/a-republic-if-you-can-keep-it-elizabeth-willing-powel-benjamin-franklin-and-the-james-mchenry-journal\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Mulvihill, G., and K. Kruesi. \u201cArizona and Missouri Join States with Abortion Amendments on the Ballot. What Would the Measures Do?\u201d Associated Press, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId188\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/abortion-election-2024-roe-ballot-4403190b898e501b0834053c3417d072\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/abortion-election-2024-roe-ballot-4403190b898e501b0834053c3417d072<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">National Conference of State Legislatures. \u201cInitiative and Referendum Overview and Resources.\u201d 2022. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId189\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-overview-and-resources\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-overview-and-resources<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">National Conference of State Legislatures. \u201cInitiative and Referendum States.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId190\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-states\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-states<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">National Public Radio. \u201cGray Davis Reflects on His Recall, as Californians Decide Gov. Newsom\u2019s Fate.\u201d 2021. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId191\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2021\/09\/12\/1036475253\/gray-davis-reflects-on-his-recall-as-californians-decide-gov-newsoms-fate\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2021\/09\/12\/1036475253\/gray-davis-reflects-on-his-recall-as-californians-decide-gov-newsoms-fate<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">New, M. \u201cThe Tax Revolt Turns 25.\u201d Cato Institute, 2003. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId192\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cato.org\/commentary\/tax-revolt-turns-25\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.cato.org\/commentary\/tax-revolt-turns-25<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Nicholson, S. \u201cThe Political Environment and Ballot Proposition Awareness.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">American Journal of Political Science<\/em><\/span> 47 (2003): 403\u2013410.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Nicholson, S. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Voting the Agenda: Candidates, Elections, and Ballot Propositions<\/em><\/span>. Princeton University Press, 2005.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Oyez. \u201cMeyer v. Grant.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId193\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1987\/87-920\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1987\/87-920<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Pateman, C. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Participation and Democratic Theory<\/em><\/span>. Cambridge University Press, 1970.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Perry, N., and L. Rathke. \u201cIn Vermont, \u2018Town Meeting\u2019 Is Democracy Embodied. What Can the Rest of the Country Learn from It?\u201d Associated Press, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId194\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/democracy-town-meeting-vermont-elections-civility-elmore-11d7d1b63037d054506e77e261aff87c\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/democracy-town-meeting-vermont-elections-civility-elmore-11d7d1b63037d054506e77e261aff87c<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Phillips, J. \u201cDoes the Citizen Initiative Weaken Party Government in the U.S. States?\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 8 (2008): 127\u2013149.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Piper, K. \u201cCalifornia\u2019s Ballot Initiative System Isn\u2019t Working. How Do We Fix It?\u201d Vox, 2020. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId195\" href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/future-perfect\/2020\/11\/6\/21549654\/california-ballot-initiative-proposition-direct-democracy\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.vox.com\/future-perfect\/2020\/11\/6\/21549654\/california-ballot-initiative-proposition-direct-democracy<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Pittman, A. \u201c\u2018Democracy Dies Blow by Blow\u2019: How Mississippi\u2019s Supreme Court Killed the Ballot Initiative Twice in 99 Years.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Mississippi Free Press<\/em><\/span>, 2021. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId196\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mississippifreepress.org\/democracy-dies-blow-by-blow-voters-ask-supreme-court-for-initiative-65-rehearing\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.mississippifreepress.org\/democracy-dies-blow-by-blow-voters-ask-supreme-court-for-initiative-65-rehearing\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Pott, M. \u201cWhy Republican Voters Support Ballot Initiatives Their Red States Do Not.\u201d FiveThirtyEight, 2022.<span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId197\" href=\"https:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/why-republican-voters-support-ballot-initiatives-their-red-states-do-not\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/why-republican-voters-support-ballot-initiatives-their-red-states-do-not\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Qvortrup, M. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Referendums Around the World<\/em><\/span>. Springer, 2024.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Radcliff, B., and G. Shufeldt. \u201cDirect Democracy and Subjective Well-Being: The Initiative and Life Satisfaction in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Social Indicators Research<\/em><\/span> 128 (2016): 1405\u20131423.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Rosenbaum, J. \u201cAbortion Rights on the Ballot May Not Be Bad News for Republicans Everywhere.\u201d National Public Radio, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId198\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2024\/04\/27\/1246609040\/abortion-rights-ballot-missouri-republicans\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2024\/04\/27\/1246609040\/abortion-rights-ballot-missouri-republicans<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Rovner, J. \u201cRepublican Candidates Are Downplaying Abortion, but It Keeps Coming Up.\u201d National Public Radio, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId199\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/shots-health-news\/2024\/07\/01\/nx-s1-5023157\/abortion-republican-candidates-voting-election-issue\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/shots-health-news\/2024\/07\/01\/nx-s1-5023157\/abortion-republican-candidates-voting-election-issue<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Sabato, L., B. Larson, and H. Ernst. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Dangerous Democracy? The Battle over Ballot Initiatives in America<\/em><\/span>. Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2001.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Simonovits, G., A. Guess, and J. Nagler. \u201cResponsiveness Without Representation: Evidence from Minimum Wage Laws in U.S. States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">American Journal of Political Science<\/em><\/span> 63 (2019): 401\u2013410.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Smith, D., and D. Fridkin. \u201cDelegating Direct Democracy: Interparty Legislative Competition and the Adoption of the Initiative in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">American Political Science Review<\/em><\/span> 102 (2008): 333\u2013350.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Smith, D., and C. Tolbert. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States<\/em><\/span>. University of Michigan Press, 2004.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Smith, D., and C. Tolbert. \u201cThe Instrumental and Educative Effects of Ballot Measures: Research on Direct Democracy in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 7 (2007): 416\u2013445.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Steck, E., A. Kaczynski, M. Chac\u00f3n, and P. Gallagher. \u201cRepublican Candidates Downplay Past Anti-Abortion Stances Ahead of 2024 Election.\u201d CNN, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId200\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/interactive\/2024\/04\/politics\/abortion-rights-republican-2024-election-dg\/index.html\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/interactive\/2024\/04\/politics\/abortion-rights-republican-2024-election-dg\/index.html<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Sundquist, J. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States<\/em><\/span>. Brookings Institution, 1983.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Thrush, G. \u201c\u2018We\u2019re Not a Democracy,\u2019 Says Mike Lee, a Republican Senator. That\u2019s a Good Thing, He Adds.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The New York Times<\/em><\/span>, 2020. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId201\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/10\/08\/us\/elections\/mike-lee-democracy.html\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/10\/08\/us\/elections\/mike-lee-democracy.html<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">United States Census Bureau. \u201cCensus Bureau Releases New Educational Attainment Data.\u201d 2023. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId202\" href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/newsroom\/press-releases\/2023\/educational-attainment-data.html\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.census.gov\/newsroom\/press-releases\/2023\/educational-attainment-data.html<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Vollers, A. \u201cDespite GOP Headwinds, Citizen-Led Abortion Measures Could Be on the Ballot in 9 States.\u201d Stateline, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId203\" href=\"https:\/\/stateline.org\/2024\/06\/21\/despite-gop-headwinds-citizen-led-abortion-measures-could-be-on-the-ballot-in-9-states\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/stateline.org\/2024\/06\/21\/despite-gop-headwinds-citizen-led-abortion-measures-could-be-on-the-ballot-in-9-states\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Wattenberg, M., I. McAllister, and A. Salvanto. \u201cHow Voting Is like Taking an SAT Test: An Analysis of American Voter Rolloff.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">American Politics Research<\/em><\/span> 28 (2000): 234\u2013250.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Wike, R., J. Fetterrolf, M. Smerkovich, S. Austin, S. Gubbala, and J. Lippert. \u201cRepresentative Democracy Remains a Popular Ideal, but People Around the World Are Critical of How It\u2019s Working.\u201d Pew Research Center, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId204\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/global\/2024\/02\/28\/representative-democracy-remains-a-popular-ideal-but-people-around-the-world-are-critical-of-how-its-working\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/global\/2024\/02\/28\/representative-democracy-remains-a-popular-ideal-but-people-around-the-world-are-critical-of-how-its-working\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Wilson, R. \u201c\u2018If This Thing Qualifies, I\u2019m Toast\u2019: An Oral History of the Gray Davis Recall in California.\u201d The Hill, 2021. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId205\" href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/homenews\/campaign\/556014-if-this-thing-qualifies-im-toast-an-oral-history-of-the-gray-davis-recall\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/thehill.com\/homenews\/campaign\/556014-if-this-thing-qualifies-im-toast-an-oral-history-of-the-gray-davis-recall\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Zimmerman, J. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The New England Town Meeting: Democracy in Action<\/em><\/span>, Praeger, 1999.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Zuckerman, M. \u201cMirage of Democracy: The Town Meeting in America.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Journal of Public Deliberation<\/em><\/span> 15 (2019): Article 3.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<div class=\"textbox textbox--examples\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Chapter Summary<\/p>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<p class=\"import-pf\">The United States follows a model of representative democracy, where citizens elect public officials to make decisions on their behalf. Direct democracy is a unique institutional feature available in some states to engage constituents directly with policymaking. Roughly half of all states utilize mechanisms like initiatives, referendums, and recalls allowing voters direct input. This chapter discusses the differences between direct and representative democracy, differences in direct democratic institutions across the states, the origins of direct democracy, and arguments for and against direct democracy.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Student Learning Objectives<\/p>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<p class=\"import-paft\">Upon completion of this chapter, students should be able to:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Recognize the differences between representative and direct democracy.<\/li>\n<li>Compare and contrast among the three major institutions (initiative, referendum, and recall) of direct democracy.<\/li>\n<li>Identify differences among the four major types of initiatives (statutory, constitutional, direct, and indirect).<\/li>\n<li>Identify differences between the two major types of referendum (legislative and popular).<\/li>\n<li>Explain the origins of direct democracy in the United States.<\/li>\n<li>Analyze how state variation in the process of direct democracy is associated with state differences in the frequency of its use.<\/li>\n<li>Evaluate both arguments in favor of and opposed to direct democracy.<\/li>\n<li>Assess the educative effects of direct democracy.<\/li>\n<li>Evaluate recent efforts by state governments to limit how citizens are able to utilize direct democracy.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--exercises\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Focus Questions<\/p>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<p class=\"import-paft\">These questions illustrate the main concepts covered in the chapter and should help guide discussion as well as enable students to critically analyze and apply the material covered.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-ulf\" style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: 18pt;\">In what ways have the founding fathers been successful in designing a government that limits the role of popular opinion in governance? How have those institutions they created to minimize the \u201cpassions of the people\u201d changed or remained over time?<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-ul\" style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: 18pt;\">How are states different in their use of direct democratic institutions?<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-ul\" style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: 18pt;\">How difficult should the process be for an initiative, referendum, or recall to make the ballot?<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-ul\" style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: 18pt;\">What are some of the arguments in favor of direct democracy? What are some of the arguments against it?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h1 class=\"import-ah\">What Is Direct Democracy?<\/h1>\n<p class=\"import-paft\">When Benjamin Franklin was exiting the Constitutional Convention, a woman by the name of Elizabeth Willing Powel asked him, \u201cWhat have we got, a republic or a monarchy?\u201d Franklin replied, \u201cA republic if you can keep it.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Miller, \u201c\u2018Republic If You Can Keep It.\u2019\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-1\" href=\"#footnote-54-1\" aria-label=\"Footnote 1\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[1]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> The United States was established as a <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">republic<\/strong><\/span> or <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">representative democracy<\/strong><\/span> where citizens play an active role in government by voting for representatives to make decisions in government on their behalf. While some argue that being established as a republic precludes being a democracy, that is a false contrast or a distinction without a difference.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Beauchamp, \u201cSen. Mike Lee\u2019s Tweets\u201d; Dobski, \u201cAmerican Is a Republic\u201d; Elvin, \u201cIs America a Democracy?\u201d; Keating, \u201cReal Reason Why\u201d; Thrush, \u201c\u2018We\u2019re Not a Democracy.\u2019\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-2\" href=\"#footnote-54-2\" aria-label=\"Footnote 2\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[2]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">We\u2019re not a democracy.<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SenMikeLee\/status\/1314016169993670656?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 8, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Democracy isn\u2019t the objective; liberty, peace, and prospefity are. We want the human condition to flourish. Rank democracy can thwart that.<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SenMikeLee\/status\/1314089207875371008?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 8, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"import-fighn\">Figure 7.1\u00a0<\/span>Senator Mike Lee\u2019s Tweets<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><em>Source: \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/SenMikeLee\/status\/1314016169993670656?mx=2\">We\u2019re not a democracy<\/a>.\u201d and \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/SenMikeLee\/status\/1314089207875371008\">Democracy isn\u2019t the objective; liberty, peace, and prospefity [sic] are. We want the human condition to flourish. Rank democracy can thwart that.<\/a>\u201d by Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) on x.com (formerly Twitter). Embedded per <a href=\"https:\/\/developer.x.com\/en\/developer-terms\/display-requirements\">https:\/\/developer.x.com\/en\/developer-terms\/display-requirements<\/a>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">To the extent the republican form of government in the United States is not considered a democracy, that is in contrast to a <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">pure<\/strong><\/span> or <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">direct democracy<\/strong><\/span>, a system of government where citizens vote directly on policies rather than indirectly through elected officials. Democracy has its roots in ancient Greece. The word <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">democracy<\/em><\/span> stems from the Greek word <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">demos<\/em><\/span> (which means \u201cthe people\u201d) and <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">kratos<\/em><\/span> (which means \u201crule\u201d)\u2014literally, \u201crule by the people.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The founding fathers chose to pursue a representative democracy rather than a direct democracy based on their concerns about human nature, mob rule, and tyrannical majorities. James Madison wrote, \u201cIf men were angels, no government would be necessary.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Hamilton et al., Federalist Papers.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-3\" href=\"#footnote-54-3\" aria-label=\"Footnote 3\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[3]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Almost two centuries later, former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill famously remarked that \u201cit has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Churchill, \u201cWorst Form of Government.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-4\" href=\"#footnote-54-4\" aria-label=\"Footnote 4\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[4]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> The founders certainly had these types of concerns in mind, as previously described in <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">Chapter 2<\/span><\/span>; the Constitution structured a government in an attempt to balance <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">majority rule with minority rights<\/strong><\/span>. Through a system of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism, the Constitution was designed to ensure that too much power was not concentrated in a single institution or with a single elected official. Yet a republican form of government would best ensure the protection of rights and liberties.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">At the time the Constitution was ratified, only members of the US House of Representatives were directly elected by citizens. Senators were indirectly elected by state legislatures until the passage of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913. Supreme Court justices receive lifetime appointments without any direct citizen involvement in their nomination or retention. Even the process of amending the Constitution in Article V does not provide a direct way for citizens to participate. Twenty-six of the twenty-seven amendments to the Constitution have been ratified by receiving two-thirds support in each chamber of Congress and at least three-fourths of the country\u2019s state legislatures. There is no process for a national referendum. Voting for the president is the only national vote citizens in the United States take, and even it remains an indirect vote based on the role of the Electoral College in electing the president. So while the federal government follows a representative form of democracy, significant state variation exists in the institutions of direct democracy.<\/p>\n<h1 class=\"import-ah\">What Are the Different Institutions in Direct Democracy?<\/h1>\n<p class=\"import-paft\">While citizens have no direct role or ability to vote for or against prospective amendments to the US Constitution, citizens of nearly every state have the opportunity to affect change to their state constitutions. In forty-nine out of the fifty states, citizens have some sort of role or mechanism to approve proposed state constitutional amendments.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cConstitutional Amendment.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-5\" href=\"#footnote-54-5\" aria-label=\"Footnote 5\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[5]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Delaware is the sole exception, where the state legislature controls the process without direct voter participation. The rest of this discussion will extend beyond just state constitutional amendments.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The three major forms or types of direct democracy are the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">initiative<\/strong><\/span>, the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">referendum<\/strong><\/span>, and the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">recall<\/strong><\/span>. An initiative is a citizen-driven ballot measure to pass a new policy or to direct the state legislature to vote on said policy. A referendum, the most common form of direct democracy, is when citizens vote on a policy that has already been considered by the state (or local) government. A recall is a vote to remove an elected official before their term expires.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_282\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-282\" style=\"width: 624px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"wp-image-282 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.2-Direct-Democracy-by-State.jpg\" alt=\"United States map showing which states have each type, or no, direct democracy. 17 states have no direct democracy, 13 states have initiative, referendum and recall, 3 states have initiative only, 2 states have referendum only, 7 states have recall only, and 8 states have initiative and referendum.\" width=\"624\" height=\"437\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.2-Direct-Democracy-by-State.jpg 624w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.2-Direct-Democracy-by-State-300x210.jpg 300w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.2-Direct-Democracy-by-State-65x46.jpg 65w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.2-Direct-Democracy-by-State-225x158.jpg 225w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.2-Direct-Democracy-by-State-350x245.jpg 350w\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-282\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 7.2 &#8211; Direct Democracy by State<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201cForms of Direct Democracy in the American States.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Forms_of_direct_democracy_in_the_American_states\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Forms_of_direct_democracy_in_the_American_states<\/a>. Map made by author.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\"><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">Figure 7.2<\/span><\/span> demonstrates that seventeen of the fifty states have no direct democratic institutions in their states. These states are largely concentrated in the South, mid-Atlantic, and New England. With the exception of Iowa and Texas, states without any direct democratic institutions are east of the Mississippi River. The remaining thirty-three states have some sort of direct democratic institution. Thirteen states possess all three forms (initiative, referendum, and recall). Geographically, with the exception of Michigan, they are all west of the Mississippi River. This geographic pattern will be explored in more detail in the next section (<span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">\u201cWhat Are the Origins of Direct Democracy in the United States?\u201d<\/span><\/span>).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Twenty-four states have some access to the initiative process.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"National Conference of State Legislatures, \u201cInitiative and Referendum States.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-6\" href=\"#footnote-54-6\" aria-label=\"Footnote 6\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[6]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> The two primary types of initiatives are <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">statutory<\/strong><\/span> and <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">constitutional initiatives<\/strong><\/span>. Statutory initiatives provide voters the opportunity to pass a new law, whereas constitutional initiatives involve adding language or amending the state constitution. Twenty-one states have the statutory initiative and six have both types, while Florida, Illinois, and Mississippi only have the constitutional initiative. Within these two types of initiatives, differences also exist in whether voters directly or indirectly play a role.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_283\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-283\" style=\"width: 624px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"wp-image-283 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.3-Initiative-Process-by-State.jpg\" alt=\"United States map showing which states have constitutional iniatives, statutory initiatives, both, or neither. 3 states have consitutional initiatives, 6 states have statutory initiatives, 15 states have both, and 26 states have neither.\" width=\"624\" height=\"437\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.3-Initiative-Process-by-State.jpg 624w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.3-Initiative-Process-by-State-300x210.jpg 300w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.3-Initiative-Process-by-State-65x46.jpg 65w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.3-Initiative-Process-by-State-225x158.jpg 225w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.3-Initiative-Process-by-State-350x245.jpg 350w\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-283\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 7.3 &#8211; Initiative Process by State<br \/>Data Source: National Conference of State Legislatures. \u201cInitiative and Referendum States.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-states\">https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-states<\/a>. Map made by author.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The first type is known as a <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">direct initiative<\/strong><\/span>. This form of direct democracy is what comes to mind for most when thinking about the initiative. Here citizens or organized groups create a measure that they would like to be placed on the ballot. This process involves collecting a sufficient number of signatures from registered voters throughout the state to qualify for ballot access. If the initiative successfully makes it onto the ballot, voters <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">directly<\/em><\/span> consider it by voting yes or no. This stands in contrast to an <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">indirect initiative<\/strong><\/span>, where an additional step is involved. Prior to the initiative being placed on the ballot, it is first considered by the state legislature. If the legislature approves the initiative, it becomes law. If, however, the legislature rejects the initiative, then voters get the chance to vote on the measure to override the state legislature.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Of the twenty-one states with the statutory initiative, twelve of them utilize the direct initiative. Seven states possess the indirect initiative. Utah and Wyoming voters can utilize both the direct and indirect processes. Of the three states with only the constitutional initiative, Florida and Illinois directly place the ballot measure before voters.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">In Mississippi, they have utilized the indirect initiative since 1992. However, the process in Mississippi has been in limbo since 2021.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Pittman, \u201c\u2018Democracy Dies Blow by Blow.\u2019\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-7\" href=\"#footnote-54-7\" aria-label=\"Footnote 7\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[7]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> The Mississippi Constitution, specifically section 273(3), requires that citizens seeking to place a measure on the ballot gather one-fifth of their required signatures from each of Mississippi\u2019s five congressional districts. After successfully submitting enough signatures to get a medical marijuana initiative on the ballot, the Mississippi Supreme Court struck down the measure, identifying that it failed to meet the signature requirements because Mississippi lost one of its five congressional districts due to redistricting after the 2000 Census: \u201cWhether with intent, by oversight, or for some other reason, the drafters of section 273(3) wrote a ballot-initiative process that cannot work in a world where Mississippi has fewer than five representatives in Congress.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Pittman, \u201c\u2018Democracy Dies Blow by Blow.\u2019\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-8\" href=\"#footnote-54-8\" aria-label=\"Footnote 8\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[8]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> This 2021 decision is the second time the Mississippi Supreme Court has struck down the initiative, having done so previously in 1922, overturning the will of voters from 1914.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The 2024 election is poised to feature twenty-three statutory initiatives and thirteen constitutional initiatives. These thirty-four initiatives cover many diverse policy areas, including abortion, tax reform, raising the minimum wage, marijuana legalization, election reform, and changes to the initiative process itself.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201c2024 Ballot Measures.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-9\" href=\"#footnote-54-9\" aria-label=\"Footnote 9\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[9]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The citizen-initiative process is quite similar to the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">popular referendum<\/strong><\/span> process. Also known as a veto referendum, citizens initiate a process to create a ballot measure asking voters to consider approving or repealing a piece of legislation already passed by their state legislature. Twenty-three states possess veto referendums. Citizens enjoy a very high success rate (65 percent) of repealing legislation passed by state legislatures if they are able to make it to the ballot.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cList of Veto Referendum Ballot Measures.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-10\" href=\"#footnote-54-10\" aria-label=\"Footnote 10\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[10]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Some examples of recently repealed measures include the Maine state legislature attempting to repeal the use of ranked-choice voting and a Missouri law that attempted to make the Show-Me-State a right-to-work state.<\/p>\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" style=\"width: 100%;\" cellpadding=\"0pt 5.4pt\">\n<caption><strong><em><span class=\"import-thn\">Table 7.1 &#8211; <\/span>Success Rate of Veto Referendums, 1906\u20132022<\/em><br \/>\n<em><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\">Data Source:<\/span> Ballotpedia. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/encyclopedia.federalism.org\/index.php?title=State_Constitutional_Rights_Federalism\">List of Veto Referendum Ballot Measures<\/a>.\u201d n.d. Table made by author.<\/em><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/caption>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>State<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Total Number of<br \/>\n<\/strong><strong>Veto Referendums<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Number of <\/strong><strong>Laws Upheld<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Number of <\/strong><strong>Laws Repealed<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">WA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">39<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">8<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(21%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">31<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(79%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">OR<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">68<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">24<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(35%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">44<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(65%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">CA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">50<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">21<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(42%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">29<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(58%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">AK<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(50%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(50%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">NV<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(100%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">0<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(0%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">ID<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(43%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(57%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">WY<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(100%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">0<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(0%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">MT<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">13<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(31%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">9<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(69%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">CO<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(29%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">10<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(71%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">UT<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">0<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(0%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(100%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">AZ<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">35<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">19<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(54%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">16<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(46%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">NM<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(67%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(33%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">ND<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">75<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">28<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(37%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">47<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(63%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">SD<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">46<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">13<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(28%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">33<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(72%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">NE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">17<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(35%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">11<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(65%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">OK<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">20<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">8<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(40%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">12<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(60%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">MO<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">26<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(4%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">25<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(96%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">AR<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(11%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">8<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(89%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">MI<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">10<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(10%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">9<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(90%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">OH<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">13<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(15%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">11<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(85%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">MD<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">18<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">11<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(61%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">7<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(39%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">MA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">22<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">12<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(55%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">10<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(45%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 51px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">ME<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 167px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">31<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 172px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">13<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(42%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; width: 176px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">18<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-td\">(58%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The other form of referendum is the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">legislative referendum<\/strong><\/span>. Rather than a process initiated by the voters, the state legislature poses the question for voters to consider. All fifty states possess the legislative referendum, with many required by law to put measures in front of voters to amend the state constitution or make tax reforms.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"National Conference of State Legislatures, \u201cInitiative and Referendum Overview.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-11\" href=\"#footnote-54-11\" aria-label=\"Footnote 11\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[11]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Voters across the fifty states saw more than one hundred referred ballot measures in 2024.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201c2024 Ballot Measures.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-12\" href=\"#footnote-54-12\" aria-label=\"Footnote 12\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[12]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> For example, California voters will vote on Proposition 3 to repeal a prior 2008 vote (Proposition 8) that defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman. The United States is one of the rare advanced industrial democracies to not have a national legislative referendum process.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Qvortrup, Referendums Around the World.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-13\" href=\"#footnote-54-13\" aria-label=\"Footnote 13\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[13]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The final institution of direct democracy is the recall. Twenty states have the ability to recall an elected official before their term expires. Seven states possess solely the recall with no other form of direct democracy in their state. Wanting to remove an elected official before their term ends is easier said than done, as most attempts at a recall never make it to the ballot. Through the first six months of 2024, 100 out of 164 attempts did not make the ballot. Out of the 64 that made the ballot, 38 were removed from office (i.e., the recall was successful), 6 quit (the recall had the intended effect), and 20 attempts were defeated (the incumbent remained in office).<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cRecall Overview.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-14\" href=\"#footnote-54-14\" aria-label=\"Footnote 14\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[14]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_284\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-284\" style=\"width: 507px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"wp-image-284\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.4-Success-of-Recall.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"507\" height=\"296\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.4-Success-of-Recall.jpg 576w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.4-Success-of-Recall-300x175.jpg 300w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.4-Success-of-Recall-65x38.jpg 65w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.4-Success-of-Recall-225x131.jpg 225w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.4-Success-of-Recall-350x204.jpg 350w\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-284\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 7.4 &#8211; Success of Recall Efforts<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201cPolitical Recall Efforts.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Political_recall_efforts\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Political_recall_efforts<\/a>. Table made by author.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Compared to statewide office holders, more attempts (and more success) to recall elected officials happen at the local level. Members of school boards and city councils are more likely to face (and lose) recall compared to governors or state legislatures. Only two governors have ever successfully been recalled in US history. The most prominent and recent successful recall was when California voters removed Governor Gray Davis in 2003. Davis, a Democrat, was first elected in 1998 with almost 58 percent of the vote. In 2002, he was reelected with 47 percent of the vote. However, less than one year after receiving a second term, Davis was recalled with 55 percent of the vote. He was recalled, in part, due to an energy crisis and budget deficit associated with the dot-com bubble burst.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Wilson, \u201c\u2018If This Thing Qualifies.\u2019\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-15\" href=\"#footnote-54-15\" aria-label=\"Footnote 15\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[15]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> In a subsequent election, he was replaced by actor Arnold Schwarzenegger.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cGray Davis Recall\u201d; National Public Radio, \u201cGray Davis Reflects.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-16\" href=\"#footnote-54-16\" aria-label=\"Footnote 16\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[16]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_199\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-199\" style=\"width: 219px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"wp-image-199 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.5-219x300.jpg\" alt=\"Headshot of Gray Davis.\" width=\"219\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.5-219x300.jpg 219w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.5-65x89.jpg 65w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.5-225x308.jpg 225w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.5-350x479.jpg 350w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.5.jpg 584w\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-199\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong><span class=\"import-fighn\">Figure 7.5 &#8211; <\/span>Governor Gray Davis<br \/>Source: &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/flickr.com\/photos\/42757699@N04\/5094533137\">Gray Davis<\/a>&#8221; by Neon Tommy on Flickr \/ <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA<\/a>.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">More recently, many partisan activists have sought to recall governors, such as Scott Walker in Wisconsin in 2012 and Gavin Newsom in California in 2021.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cScott Walker Recall\u201d; Ballotpedia, \u201cGavin Newsom Recall.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-17\" href=\"#footnote-54-17\" aria-label=\"Footnote 17\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[17]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> After expensive and nasty partisan battles, both Walker and Newsom were able to remain in office after unsuccessful recall efforts.<\/p>\n<h1 class=\"import-ah\">What Are the Origins of Direct Democracy in the United States?<\/h1>\n<p class=\"import-paft\">The roots of direct democracy in the United States predate the official founding as an independent country by more than one hundred years. Many New England states, then colonies, began hosting regular <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">town hall meetings<\/strong><\/span>. These participatory meetings facilitate a model of <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">deliberative democracy<\/strong><\/span>, where citizens engage in open discussion before publicly voting on matters of civic interest. However, how truly open, inclusive, and participatory they were is open to debate.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Bryan, Real Democracy; Zimmerman, New England Town Meeting; Zuckerman, \u201cMirage of Democracy.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-18\" href=\"#footnote-54-18\" aria-label=\"Footnote 18\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[18]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Rather than hiding behind the safety and anonymity of the secret ballot or behind the \u201ctoo-big\u201d mechanisms of government institutions, the town hall format \u201cforced civility.\u201d Today, these meetings occur annually as the sole method of governing. For example, the residents of Elmore, Vermont, voted in 2023 to keep their town hall tradition alive by more than a 2\u20131 margin.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Perry and Rathke, \u201cIn Vermont, \u2018Town Meeting.\u2019\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-19\" href=\"#footnote-54-19\" aria-label=\"Footnote 19\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[19]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p><iframe id=\"oembed-1\" title=\"Town Meeting Day: A New England Tradition\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/D61uQw7DeXI?feature=oembed&#38;rel=0\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-figh\"><em><strong><span class=\"import-fighn\">Figure 7.6 &#8211; <\/span>New England Town Hall Meetings<\/strong><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><br \/>\n<strong>Source:<\/strong><\/span><strong> ConcordNHTV. &#8220;Town Meeting Day: A New England Tradition.&#8221; YouTube, Mar 2, 2024.\u00a0<span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId133\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=D61uQw7DeXI\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=D61uQw7DeXI<\/span><\/a><\/span>. \/ Embedded with the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/static?template=terms\">Standard YouTube License.<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Outside of New England, states were slower to implement aspects of direct democracy into their state and local governments. Thomas Jefferson unsuccessfully proposed that Virginia voters should ratify the state\u2019s 1775 constitution. Throughout the late 1700s and early 1800s, many states wrote or rewrote their constitutions and incorporated voter approval, especially for constitutional amendments.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cI&amp;R Historical Timeline\u201d; Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cHistory of the Initiative.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-20\" href=\"#footnote-54-20\" aria-label=\"Footnote 20\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[20]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">In 1848, Switzerland ratified a new constitution, moving the country from a confederacy to a federal system of government, as described in <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">Chapter 2<\/span><\/span>. As part of this new government, Swiss citizens were given the right to vote in popular initiatives, mandatory (legislative) referendums, and optional (popular) referendums.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-21\" href=\"#footnote-54-21\" aria-label=\"Footnote 21\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[21]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> While the US did not follow suit, Congress did require that all states admitted to the union after 1857 must provide voters the ability to ratify their state constitutions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The late 1800s and early 1900s mark the period when political parties were perhaps the strongest in our country\u2019s history.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Sundquist, Dynamics of the Party System.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-22\" href=\"#footnote-54-22\" aria-label=\"Footnote 22\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[22]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Jobs were allocated, and many public services were provided solely to partisan supporters based on a system of patronage. This Gilded Age was characterized by soaring economic growth, rapid urbanization, rising income inequality, and rampant political corruption, often at the hands of party bosses. As a result, many citizens sought change. The <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">Populist Party<\/strong><\/span> became the first third party to win Electoral College votes since the end of the Civil War, when they carried five states and twenty-two Electoral College votes.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Dave Leip\u2019s Atlas of U.S. Elections, \u201c1892 Presidential General Election Results.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-23\" href=\"#footnote-54-23\" aria-label=\"Footnote 23\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[23]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Four years later, many of the ideas of the Populist Party were consolidated into the Democratic Party\u2019s platform and William Jennings Bryan\u2019s nomination as president.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">Progressive Era<\/strong><\/span>, more broadly, included all sorts of \u201cgood government\u201d reforms. States switched to the secret, or Australian, ballot rather than ballots printed and distributed by political parties. Patronage was replaced with a merit system as part of broader civil service reforms. The direct election of US Senators was added to the Constitution when the Seventeenth Amendment was ratified in 1913. Women were granted the right to vote when the Nineteenth Amendment was ratified in 1920. Parties began to utilize primaries to pick candidates for the general election.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">During the Progressive Era, direct democracy began to spread across the United States. The Swiss model was replicated first by South Dakota in 1897. Returning to <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">Figure 7.2<\/span><\/span>, the vast majority of states that implemented direct democracy were geographically west of the Mississippi River. These states were more likely to experience competition between the two major parties (Democrats and Republicans) but also saw third parties (like the Populist Party) enjoy a good deal of success.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cI&amp;R Historical Timeline\u201d; Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cHistory of the Initiative\u201d; Smith and Fridkin, \u201cDelegating Direct Democracy,\u201d 333\u2013350.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-24\" href=\"#footnote-54-24\" aria-label=\"Footnote 24\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[24]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" cellpadding=\"0pt 5.4pt\">\n<caption><strong><em><span class=\"import-thn\">Table 7.2 &#8211; <\/span>Year of Initiative Adoption by State<\/em><br \/>\n<em><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\">Data Source:<\/span> Initiative and Referendum Institute. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/64fb2a824bc4a564c732b324\/t\/6547f6da992d3b25ee06bbae\/1699215066808\/Almanac%20-%20I&amp;R%20Historical%20Timeline%20(1).pdf\">I&amp;R Historical Timeline<\/a>.\u201d n.d.; Initiative and Referendum Institute. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/history-us-direct-democracy\">The History of the Initiative and Referendum Process in the United States<\/a>.\u201d n.d. Table made by author.<\/em><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/caption>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>State<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Year Approved<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">South Dakota<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1898<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Utah<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1900<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oregon<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1902<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Montana<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1906<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oklahoma<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1907<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Missouri<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1908<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Maine<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1908<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Colorado<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1910<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arkansas<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1910<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">California<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1911<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arizona<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1911<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nebraska<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1912<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Idaho<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1912<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nevada<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1912<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Ohio<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1912<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Washington<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1912<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Michigan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1913<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Mississippi<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1914<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">North Dakota<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1914<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Massachusetts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1918<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Alaska<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1956<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Florida<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1968<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Wyoming<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1968<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Illinois<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1970<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Twenty of the twenty-four states that currently have the initiative added it between 1898 and 1918. Eighty-three percent of all the states with the initiative added it during that twenty-year window. Illinois was one of the last states to add the initiative in 1970. As previously described, Mississippi adopted the initiative for a second time in 1992, only to have the state supreme court rule it to be effectively impossible for citizens to gather sufficient signatures to get an initiative on the ballot.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Pittman, \u201c\u2018Democracy Dies Blow by Blow.\u2019\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-25\" href=\"#footnote-54-25\" aria-label=\"Footnote 25\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[25]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> While some progress has been made in adding the initiative or other forms of direct democracy to additional states, politicians seem unlikely and unwilling to give voters the chance to participate in direct democracy. As succinctly articulated by a Texas Republican explaining his party\u2019s shift from supporting to opposing direct democracy in the state, \u201cIf you\u2019re out of government, you\u2019re in favor of initiatives. If you\u2019re in government, they become not so appealing.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Crary, \u201cUS States Spit.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-26\" href=\"#footnote-54-26\" aria-label=\"Footnote 26\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[26]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<h1 class=\"import-ah\">How Does the Initiative Process Work, and How Is It Different State by State?<\/h1>\n<p class=\"import-paft\">Having established that there is significant state variation in the existence of direct democracy across the fifty states, it is also worthwhile to dig deeper to examine further differences. Not all states utilize direct democracy at the same rate, and they have very different rules and regulations governing its use. In 1978, California voters approved Proposition 13 by almost a 2\u20131 margin, drastically limiting future property tax increases and requiring supermajority support for additional tax increases.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cCalifornia Proposition 13\u201d; Hayward, \u201cTax Revolt Turns 20\u201d; New, \u201cTax Revolt Turns 25\u201d; Drum, \u201cHappy 35th Birthday, Tax Revolt.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-27\" href=\"#footnote-54-27\" aria-label=\"Footnote 27\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[27]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> This led many to call for a \u201ctaxpayer revolt,\u201d which sparked many similar initiatives and referendums across the country.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">As depicted in <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-xref\">Figure 7.7<\/span><\/span>, the last forty years have seen a significant growth in the number of ballot measures. However, the trend appears to be slowing down in the last few election cycles, as many states have passed legislation making it harder for initiatives to reach the ballot.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_285\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-285\" style=\"width: 535px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"wp-image-285\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.7.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"535\" height=\"312\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.7.jpg 576w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.7-300x175.jpg 300w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.7-65x38.jpg 65w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.7-225x131.jpg 225w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/7.7-350x204.jpg 350w\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-285\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 7.7 &#8211; Number of Initiatives by Decade<br \/>Data Source: National Conference of State Legislatures. \u201cStatewide Ballot Measures Database.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/statewide-ballot-measures-database\">https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/statewide-ballot-measures-database<\/a>; Initiative and Referendum Institute. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/direct-democracy-data\">Direct Democracy Historical Database<\/a>.\u201d n.d.\u00a0Graph made by author.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">While the number of initiatives has risen over the last half-century, the use of the initiative is uneven across the twenty-four states that feature this institution. The five states that most frequently utilize the initiative (California, Oregon, Colorado, Washington, and Arizona) account for 53 percent of all initiatives in our country\u2019s history. The top ten states account for more than 75 percent of all initiatives.<\/p>\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" cellpadding=\"0pt 5.4pt\">\n<caption><strong><em><span class=\"import-thn\">Table 7.3 &#8211; <\/span>Number of Initiatives, 1904\u20132024<\/em><br \/>\n<em><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\">Data Source:<\/span> National Conference of State Legislatures. \u201cStatewide Ballot Measures Database.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId138\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/statewide-ballot-measures-database\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/statewide-ballot-measures-database<\/span><\/a><\/span>. Table made by author.<\/em><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/caption>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>State<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Number of Initiatives<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">California<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">501<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oregon<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">440<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Colorado<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">397<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Washington<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">342<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arizona<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">209<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Missouri<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">206<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">North Dakota<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">205<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arkansas<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">186<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Massachusetts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">153<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Montana<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">100<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oklahoma<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">99<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Ohio<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">97<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Florida<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">96<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Michigan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">95<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">South Dakota<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">86<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Maine<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">81<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nevada<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">79<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nebraska<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">69<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Alaska<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">59<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Idaho<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">37<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Utah<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">23<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Mississippi<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">12<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Wyoming<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Illinois<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">In general, the states with the most use have the easiest time accessing it and are least hampered by the state legislature.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Bowler and Donovan, \u201cMeasuring the Effect,\u201d 345\u2013363.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-28\" href=\"#footnote-54-28\" aria-label=\"Footnote 28\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[28]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Shaun Bowler and Todd Donovan created a six-point index for how difficult it is for an initiative to qualify for the ballot. Higher scores are associated with greater levels of difficulty. The general procedure for how the initiative process works is articulated in the following paragraphs with references made to Bowler and Donovan\u2019s index.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"The Council of State Governments, \u201cHow Ballot Measures Get on the Ballot\u201d; Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-29\" href=\"#footnote-54-29\" aria-label=\"Footnote 29\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[29]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" style=\"height: 925px;\" cellpadding=\"0pt 5.4pt\">\n<caption><strong><em><span class=\"import-thn\">Table 7.4 &#8211; <\/span>State Variation in Ballot Qualification and Legislative Insulation<\/em><br \/>\n<em><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\">Data Source:<\/span> Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. \u201cMeasuring the Effect of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives Are Created Equal.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/span> 4 (2004): 345\u2013363. Table made by author.<\/em><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/caption>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>State<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Qualification Difficulty Score<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-tch\"><strong>Legislative Insulation Index<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oregon<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">California<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Colorado<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">North Dakota<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arkansas<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Ohio<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Michigan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">South Dakota<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Idaho<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Utah<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Arizona<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Washington<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Oklahoma<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Montana<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Missouri<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Massachusetts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nebraska<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Maine<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Nevada<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Florida<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Illinois<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Alaska<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Mississippi<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"TableNormal-R\" style=\"height: 37px;\">\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 123.295px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">Wyoming<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 250.994px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"TableNormal-C\" style=\"padding: 0pt 5.4pt; height: 37px; width: 238.935px;\">\n<p class=\"import-td\">9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The first item that is considered part of Bowler and Donovan\u2019s index is whether the state allows both statutory and constitutional initiatives (0) or only one of the two types of initiatives (1). As previously discussed, the last three states to add the initiative (Florida, Illinois, and Mississippi) only add constitutional, and not statutory, initiatives.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Once an idea is generated\u2014whether by active citizens, organized interest groups, or even the state legislature (in the instances of legislative referendums), a proposal is submitted to the appropriate state official for review. This preliminary filing includes draft language that supporters would like to see on the ballot.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"The Council of State Governments, \u201cHow Ballot Measures Get on the Ballot.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-30\" href=\"#footnote-54-30\" aria-label=\"Footnote 30\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[30]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> In most states, two or more government officials or entities play a role in drafting the language that appears on the ballot and is distributed to voters. The most common elected officials are the state legislature (or some committee of the legislature), the attorney general, or the secretary of state.<\/p>\n<p>Figure 7.8 &#8211; Responsibility for Ballot Language<br \/>\nData Source: Boldt, A. \u201cDirect Democracy in the States: A 50-State Survey of the Journey to the Ballot.\u201d State Democracy Research Initiative, University of Wisconsin Law School. 2023. . Graph made by author.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 823px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/07\/Figure-7.8.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"823\" height=\"591\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 7.8 &#8211; Responsibility for Ballot Language<br \/>Data Source: Boldt, A. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/statedemocracy.law.wisc.edu\/direct-democracy\/\">Direct Democracy in the States: A 50-State Survey of the Journey to the Ballot.<\/a>\u201d State Democracy Research Initiative, University of Wisconsin Law School. 2023. . Graph made by author.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/07\/Figure-7.8.png<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Part of what the government reviews is whether the proposed policy is appropriate for the initiative. The second part of Bowler and Donovan\u2019s index is whether there are substantive <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">subject restrictions<\/strong><\/span>. Seven states (Alaska, Illinois, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, and Wyoming) have specific limits on the types of policies the initiative can and cannot address.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cSubject Restrictions for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-31\" href=\"#footnote-54-31\" aria-label=\"Footnote 31\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[31]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Some of these restrictions are making appropriations (dictating how state money will be spent), modifying judicial proceedings, or infringing upon rights or liberties spelled out in the state\u2019s constitution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Sixteen states also include <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">single-subject rules<\/strong><\/span> as part of their initiative process.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cSingle-Subject Rule for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-32\" href=\"#footnote-54-32\" aria-label=\"Footnote 32\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[32]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> This restriction limits initiatives to address a single policy area to prevent logrolling\u2014that is, preventing groups from combining initiatives together in order to garner additional support. For example, groups in Missouri interested in raising the minimum wage and legalizing recreational marijuana would not be permitted to combine forces in a single initiative. Voters must consider each initiative on its own merit.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">As part of the official review, the appropriate government representative drafts an official title and the summary language that would appear on the ballot. The process of drafting language can be contentious and litigious (i.e., end up being the subject of a lawsuit). Who is writing the ballot language often shapes whether the perspective is sympathetic to supporters or opponents, whether it is neutral, and how accessible or understandable the language is for the average voter.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Fuller, \u201cWhy Are Ballot Measures So Darn Confusing?\u201d; Lakoff, \u201cWhy Are Many Ballot Measures So Confusing?\u201d; Elmendorf and Spencer, \u201cAre Ballot Titles Biased?,\u201d 511\u2013549.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-33\" href=\"#footnote-54-33\" aria-label=\"Footnote 33\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[33]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">In recent years, Ballotpedia has started to assess the average grade level voters would need to possess in order to fully understand ballot titles and language.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cBallot Measure Readability Scores, 2022.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-34\" href=\"#footnote-54-34\" aria-label=\"Footnote 34\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[34]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> The average reading level to understand the title (which averages 57 words) between 2017 and 2022 is eighteen (two years of postgraduate education). The average reading level to understand the summary on the ballot (which averages 193 words) is sixteen (a senior in college). As of the 2020 Census, only 38 percent of people over the age of twenty-five possess at least a bachelor\u2019s degree. While citizens with a college degree are more likely to vote than adults without a college degree and are overrepresented among regular voters, a substantial number of voters have no college degree.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"United States Census Bureau, \u201cCensus Bureau Releases\u201d; Hartig et al., \u201cRepublican Gains.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-35\" href=\"#footnote-54-35\" aria-label=\"Footnote 35\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[35]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 670px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/07\/Ballot-Measure-Readability.png\" alt=\"Bar graph comparing the readability of average title and average summary, in grade levels, over time. Generally, title grade levels are higher than summary grade levels.\" width=\"670\" height=\"389\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 7.9 -Ballot Measure Readability<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ballot_measure_readability_scores,_2022#Historical_readability_scores\">Ballot Measure Readability Scores, 2022<\/a>.\u201d n.d. Graph made by author.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-fig\">\u00a0Once supporters have filed their proposed initiative, it has been reviewed by the appropriate government source, and the formal ballot title and summary are prepared, the next step in the process is collecting signatures to ensure that the measure has enough support to qualify for the ballot. The remaining four components of Bowler and Donovan\u2019s ballot access index are (1) whether the length of time supporters have to collect signatures is limited, (2) whether signatures must adhere to geographic distribution requirements, (3) whether the proportion of signatures required is at least 7 percent, and (4) whether the proportion of signatures required is more than 10 percent.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Of the twenty-four states that possess the initiative, fourteen of them have a <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">signature distribution requirement<\/strong><\/span>.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cSignature Distribution Requirements.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-36\" href=\"#footnote-54-36\" aria-label=\"Footnote 36\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[36]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> With the exception of Colorado, four of the five states with the most initiatives over the last century do not require signatures to come from any specific geography within the state. This makes it easier for signature gatherers to concentrate on dense, urban populations or communities where support is more readily available. Florida, Missouri, Mississippi, and Nevada base their signature requirements on congressional districts throughout the state. As previously mentioned, Mississippi\u2019s initiative is currently in flux, since the signature requirement warrants signatures from <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">five<\/em><\/span> congressional districts even though the state only has <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">four<\/em><\/span> since redistricting after the 2020 Census. Arkansas, Massachusetts, Nebraska, Ohio, and Wyoming utilize counties for the geographic requirement. The remaining five states (Alaska, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, and Utah) require signatures to be dispersed throughout state legislative districts. Maryland and New Mexico have signature requirements for their popular referendum but do not have the initiative in their states.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_289\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-289\" style=\"width: 674px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"wp-image-289 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.10.jpg\" alt=\"United States map showing which states have a geographic signature requirement (14 states), no geographic signature requirement (10 states), or no relevant iniatives (26 states).\" width=\"674\" height=\"472\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.10.jpg 674w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.10-300x210.jpg 300w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.10-65x46.jpg 65w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.10-225x158.jpg 225w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.10-350x245.jpg 350w\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-289\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 7.10 &#8211; Signature Requirements by State<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Signature_distribution_requirements_for_ballot_initiatives\">Signature Distribution Requirements for Ballot Initiatives<\/a>.\u201d n.d. Map made by author.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Increasing the signature distribution requirements is a common way that state governments attempt to limit the ability of citizens to utilize the initiative. In 2023, Ohio voters controversially were asked to consider Issue 1, which would have doubled the geographic requirement from half (44) to all (88) counties. It also would have eliminated the \u201ccure period,\u201d where supporters have ten days to submit additional signatures if their initial submission fails to meet the signature and geographic distribution requirements. Voters rejected this measure with 57 percent of the vote.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cOhio Issue 1, 60% Vote.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-37\" href=\"#footnote-54-37\" aria-label=\"Footnote 37\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[37]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The sheer volume of signatures required, especially if states have high thresholds for geographic distributions, often leaves supporters of initiatives relying on paid signature gatherers. This is even more pronounced depending on the window in which supporters can collect signatures, which ranges from ninety days to an unlimited amount of time.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cLength of Signature Gathering.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-38\" href=\"#footnote-54-38\" aria-label=\"Footnote 38\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[38]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Colorado attempted to limit the use of paid signature gatherers, but this was struck down in the US Supreme Court case <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Meyer v. Grant<\/em><\/span> for violating the First Amendment\u2019s protection of political speech.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Oyez, \u201cMeyer v. Grant.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-39\" href=\"#footnote-54-39\" aria-label=\"Footnote 39\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[39]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">As a result, many organized interest groups, like the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId142\" href=\"https:\/\/ballot.org\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">Ballot Initiative Strategy Center<\/span><\/a><\/span> (BISC), exist to provide training, strategic advice, and assistance in utilizing paid signature gatherers. While states are unable to prevent signature gatherers from being paid, states do have considerable variation as to whether the signature gatherers must be state residents, whether they can be paid per signature, or whether they can impose other requirements on signature gatherers.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cLaws Governing Ballot Initiative.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-40\" href=\"#footnote-54-40\" aria-label=\"Footnote 40\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[40]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Once the signatures are submitted and the state government reviews them to ensure that they are legitimate and meet any necessary distribution requirements, the next step in the process is determining when voters will get a chance to weigh in on the initiative. Some states require that ballot initiatives be placed on the ballot for the next general election, whereas other states are able to place initiatives on the ballot during either a primary or a special election.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-41\" href=\"#footnote-54-41\" aria-label=\"Footnote 41\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[41]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> As voter turnout is higher in general elections compared to primary or special elections and higher in presidential elections compared to midterm elections, the decision of when to allow voters the opportunity to vote is often a strategic choice.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Prior to the election, many states are required by law to provide additional information about any initiatives and referendums to voters. Of the twenty-four states that utilize the initiative, fifteen of them are required by law to either send a pamphlet with information about the initiatives to registered voters, publicly display the pamphlet, or make it available online.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-42\" href=\"#footnote-54-42\" aria-label=\"Footnote 42\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[42]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Finally, voters get a chance to weigh in and vote in favor of or in opposition to the initiative. Most elections in the United States follow the <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">plurality rule<\/strong><\/span>, meaning whichever candidate receives the most votes wins the election. This \u201cfirst past the post\u201d framework allows a candidate to win the election without receiving more than 50 percent of the vote. Since voters are given the choice to vote yes or no on an initiative, rather than voting on two or more candidates, direct democracy largely relies on <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">majority rule<\/strong><\/span>: Whichever outcome receives 50 percent plus one vote is the winner.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">However, some states utilize <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">supermajority <\/strong><strong class=\"import-b\">rule<\/strong><\/span>, some numerical requirement above a majority, to pass ballot measures.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cSupermajority Requirements.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-43\" href=\"#footnote-54-43\" aria-label=\"Footnote 43\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[43]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> These thresholds are frequently for approving constitutional amendments (whether initiated by citizens or the state legislature) but also for specific policy areas like taxation. In 2022, Arizona voters approved Proposition 132, which increased the majority requirement from a simple majority to 60 percent in order to approve any future tax increases. Another way that states require more than a simple majority to pass a ballot measure is by utilizing a different denominator to measure turnout. Some states do not simply use whether an initiative received 50 percent plus one vote of all votes cast in the given race but rather utilize the total number of registered voters in the state, the total number of votes cast for the highest office, or some other predetermined number. Proponents of these higher thresholds point to the fact that they prevent voters from abstaining on ballot questions and ensure that election outcomes reflect the preferences of all state voters, not just those who cast a ballot on a given question.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Given the states previously mentioned, it is imperative to highlight how much the initiative process varies from state to state. No two states are completely alike when it comes to how citizens are able to utilize the initiative or other forms of direct democracy. The process, however, surely matters. State differences in the rules governing direct democracy are part of the reason why a state like Wyoming has only seven initiatives in the last one hundred years while states like Oregon and California have more than one thousand combined.<\/p>\n<h1 class=\"import-ah\">What Are the Arguments in Favor and Opposed to Direct Democracy?<\/h1>\n<p class=\"import-paft\">Political scientists frequently debate the merits and shortcomings of direct democracy.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Dyck, \u201cNew Directions,\u201d 109\u2013128; Smith and Tolbert, \u201cInstrumental and Educative Effects,\u201d 416\u2013445; Lupia and Matsusaka, \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 463\u2013482.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-44\" href=\"#footnote-54-44\" aria-label=\"Footnote 44\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[44]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> In this section, some of the more prominent arguments in favor of and opposed to the initiative will be considered.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The first major argument in favor of direct democracy is that it helps overcome the \u201csins of omission\u201d of representative democracy.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Donovan, Smith, Osborn, and Mooney et al., State and Local Politics.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-45\" href=\"#footnote-54-45\" aria-label=\"Footnote 45\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[45]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Elected officials may be unwilling or unable to turn the public opinion preferences of their constituents into public policy. Given the polarization and gridlock at the national level, many activists turn their attention to the states (and the initiative) to pursue policy goals.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Phillips, \u201cDoes the Citizen Initiative Weaken?,\u201d 127\u2013149; Ferraiolo, \u201cState Policy Activism,\u201d 378\u2013402; Lacombe and Boehmke, \u201cInitiative Process,\u201d 286\u2013305; Hicks, \u201cInitiatives,\u201d 471\u2013494; Cummins, \u201cAre Initiatives an End-Run,\u201d 443\u2013462.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-46\" href=\"#footnote-54-46\" aria-label=\"Footnote 46\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[46]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">For example, Republicans have a trifecta, where they control both chambers of the state legislature and the governorship, in twenty-three states. Voters in these states elect and reelect Republicans to control all levels of government. However, when given the opportunity to vote for individual policies, voters in these Republican-controlled states have used the initiative to raise the minimum wage, legalize recreational and medicinal marijuana, expand Medicaid, and protect abortion rights.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Pott, \u201cWhy Republican Voters Support\u201d; Simonovits, Guess, and Nagler et al., \u201cResponsiveness Without Representation,\u201d 401\u2013410; Vollers, \u201cDespite GOP Headwinds.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-47\" href=\"#footnote-54-47\" aria-label=\"Footnote 47\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[47]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_290\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-290\" style=\"width: 681px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"wp-image-290 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.11.jpg\" alt=\"United States map showing which states have Republican trifectas (23 states), Democratic trifectas (17 states), or divided governments (10 states).\" width=\"681\" height=\"474\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.11.jpg 681w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.11-300x209.jpg 300w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.11-65x45.jpg 65w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.11-225x157.jpg 225w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.11-350x244.jpg 350w\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-290\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 7.11 &#8211; Control of State Government by State<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201cState Government Trifectas.\u201d 2024. <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/State_government_trifectas\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/State_government_trifectas.<\/a> Map made by author.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Voters via the initiative are also more likely than the elected branches of government to implement \u201cgood government\u201d reforms. For example, nineteen of the twenty-one states that adopted term limits for state legislators during the 1990s and 2000s did so via the initiative.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Bowler and Donovan, Limits of Electoral Reform.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-48\" href=\"#footnote-54-48\" aria-label=\"Footnote 48\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[48]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Elected officials are less likely to vote themselves out of the job, but citizens are more than willing to do so.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The second major argument in favor of direct democracy is similar to the \u201csins of omission\u201d in that the presence of the initiative, referendum, and recall acts as a (pardon the expression) \u201cgun behind the door\u201d and forces the elected branches to be more responsive. The rapid advancement of marijuana legislation at the state level is a perfect example. States first utilized the initiative to adopt medicinal marijuana policies and programs before expanding into recreational marijuana in both Republican and Democratic states.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Mallinson and Hannah, \u201cPolicy and Political Learning,\u201d 344\u2013369; Hannah and Mallinson, \u201cDefiant Innovation,\u201d 402\u2013423.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-49\" href=\"#footnote-54-49\" aria-label=\"Footnote 49\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[49]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Where the initiative was not utilized, it often spurred legislatures to act. While some studies disagree as to the extent that the mere presence of the initiative is associated with greater responsiveness, others point to evidence that suggests that the threat of the initiative forces legislators to act, leads policy to be more closely aligned with public opinion, and leads to the initiative being used more frequently only when the preferences of voters and elected officials diverge.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Lascher, Hagen, and Rochlin et al., \u201cGun Behind the Door?,\u201d 760\u2013775; Lewis, Schneider, and Jacoby et al., \u201cImpact of Direct Democracy,\u201d 531\u2013538; Boehmke, Osborn, and Schilling et al., \u201cPivotal Politics,\u201d 665\u2013677; Simonovits, Guess, and Nagler et al., \u201cResponsiveness Without Representation,\u201d 401\u2013410.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-50\" href=\"#footnote-54-50\" aria-label=\"Footnote 50\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[50]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The initiative plays an important role in agenda setting and shaping the contours of races between candidates for office.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Nicholson, Voting the Agenda; Smith and Tolbert, Educated by Initiative; Smith and Tolbert, \u201cInstrumental and Educative Effects,\u201d 416\u2013445.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-51\" href=\"#footnote-54-51\" aria-label=\"Footnote 51\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[51]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> After the Supreme Court struck down <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Roe v. Wade<\/em><\/span> and a woman\u2019s right to have an abortion in <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Dobbs v. Jackson<\/em><\/span>, many states utilized the initiative to enshrine abortion rights at the state level. Ten states had abortion-related measures on their ballot in the November 2024 general election.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201c2023 and 2024 Abortion-Related Ballot Measures.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-52\" href=\"#footnote-54-52\" aria-label=\"Footnote 52\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[52]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Candidates often have to communicate with voters about where they stand on these initiatives. During the 2022 and 2024 cycles, many Republican candidates for office struggled with how to talk about the issue, balancing between downplaying, adjusting, or doubling down on their positions.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Rovner, \u201cRepublican Candidates Are Downplaying Abortion\u201d; Rosenbaum, \u201cAbortion Rights on the Ballot\u201d; Steck et al., \u201cRepublican Candidates Downplay.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-53\" href=\"#footnote-54-53\" aria-label=\"Footnote 53\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[53]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">One of the primary arguments against direct democracy is concerns about voter competence. To put it bluntly, are voters \u201cdumber than chimps?\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Lupia, \u201cDumber Than Chimps?\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-54\" href=\"#footnote-54-54\" aria-label=\"Footnote 54\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[54]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> While political scientist V. O. Key famously said, \u201cVoters are not fools,\u201d it is dubious to suspect that most voters understand the substance of all ballot measures.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Key, Responsible Electorate.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-55\" href=\"#footnote-54-55\" aria-label=\"Footnote 55\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[55]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">One of the reasons the founding fathers pursued representative democracy rather than democracy was their belief that elected officials would be better able to make decisions to promote the public good rather than just make self-serving decisions. Voters are less likely to be aware or knowledgeable of the various initiatives or referendums on the ballot, let alone make an informed decision.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Nicholson, Voting the Agenda; Barth, Burnett, and Parry et al., \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 1015\u20131034.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-56\" href=\"#footnote-54-56\" aria-label=\"Footnote 56\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[56]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Most voters need to rely on elite cues or endorsements from trusted interested groups, politicians, and political parties to inform how they believe they should vote on a ballot measure.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Smith and Tolbert, Educated by Initiative; Lupia and Matsusaka, \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 463\u2013482.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-57\" href=\"#footnote-54-57\" aria-label=\"Footnote 57\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[57]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">When voters are uninformed heading to the polls or are unable to understand a ballot measure, they are more likely to default and vote no to preserve the status quo<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Dyck and Pearson-Merkowitz, \u201cBallot Initiatives,\u201d 180\u2013207.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-58\" href=\"#footnote-54-58\" aria-label=\"Footnote 58\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[58]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup>\u2014that is, when they decide to cast a vote at all. Voters experience \u201c<span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">voter fatigue<\/strong><\/span>\u201d and \u201c<span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><strong class=\"import-b\">roll-off<\/strong><\/span>\u201d if the ballot is too long or they are uninformed about the various ballot measures facing them.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Nicholson, \u201cPolitical Environment,\u201d 403\u2013410; Wattenberg, McAllister, and Salvanto et al., \u201cHow Voting Is lLike Taking an SAT Test\u201d; Bowler and Donovan, Demanding Choices.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-59\" href=\"#footnote-54-59\" aria-label=\"Footnote 59\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[59]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> During the 2022 November general election, more voters cast a ballot for the highest office (whether that is a race for US Senate, governor, or some other office) than for any ballot measure. The median difference in the number of votes between the two types of contests was 70,936.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_291\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-291\" style=\"width: 818px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"wp-image-291 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.12.jpg\" alt=\"Bar graph showing the difference in number of votes cast between highest office and ballot measure, with a sample of 21 states. Differences range from nearly zero to over 600,000.\" width=\"818\" height=\"478\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.12.jpg 818w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.12-300x175.jpg 300w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.12-768x449.jpg 768w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.12-65x38.jpg 65w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.12-225x131.jpg 225w, https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/79\/2025\/06\/Figure-7.12-350x205.jpg 350w\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-291\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 7.12 &#8211; Roll-Off Voting<br \/>Data Source: Ballotpedia. \u201c2022 Ballot Measure Election Results.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2022_ballot_measure_election_results#November_8\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2022_ballot_measure_election_results#November_8<\/a>; US Elections Project. \u201c2022 General Election.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.electproject.org\/2022g\">https:\/\/www.electproject.org\/2022g<\/a>. Graph made by author.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Even if voters are aware of and understand the ballot measures before them in any given election, which is often difficult given that the writing of official language is often intended to confuse, they may not be able to handle democracy \u00e0 la carte. That is, by voting on some (but not all) legislation, citizens may send conflicting messages to their elected officials and produce unintended challenges. Voters, many of whom are symbolically conservative but operationally liberal, can hamstring elected officials by limiting the amount of revenue the government is able to collect while simultaneously approving new spending priorities.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Piper, \u201cCalifornia\u2019s Ballot Initiative System\u201d; Grossman and Hopkins, Asymmetric Politics.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-60\" href=\"#footnote-54-60\" aria-label=\"Footnote 60\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[60]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The second major critique of direct democracy is, What if a majority of voters actually gets what they want? If the majority wins, who loses?<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">First, many express concerns that direct democracy has long abandoned the populist and progressive aims of those who established the institution.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Gerber, Populist Paradox; Ellis, Democratic Delusions; Sabato, Larson, and Ernst et al., Dangerous Democracy?\" id=\"return-footnote-54-61\" href=\"#footnote-54-61\" aria-label=\"Footnote 61\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[61]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> The Supreme Court has repeatedly struck down attempts to regulate the amount of money spent supporting and opposing initiatives as a protection of the First Amendment.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cI&amp;R Historical Timeline.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-62\" href=\"#footnote-54-62\" aria-label=\"Footnote 62\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[62]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> As a result, interest groups and wealthy donors invest heavily, spending more than $1.24 billion and $1.10 billion in campaign contributions across more than one hundred different statewide ballot measures in the 2020 and 2022 elections, respectively.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Ballotpedia, \u201cBallot Measure Campaign Finance, 2022.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-63\" href=\"#footnote-54-63\" aria-label=\"Footnote 63\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[63]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The pure majoritarian nature of direct democracy also poses the threat of \u201ctyranny of the majority.\u201d Without many of the features of representative democracy (e.g., separation of powers, checks and balances, federalism), there is little to stop majorities from imposing their will on minorities. Moreover, behind the anonymity of a secret ballot compared to an open roll-call vote on the floor of the state legislature, it is easier for the majority to impose policies and restrict the civil rights of minorities\u2014whether they be rooted in terms of gender, racial or ethnic group, religious identity, or sexual orientation.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Gamble, \u201cPutting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote,\u201d 245\u2013269; Lewis, Direct Democracy and Minority Rights; Haider-Markel, Querze, and Lindman et al., \u201cLose, Win, or Draw?,\u201d 304\u2013314; Hajnal, Gerber, and Louch et al., \u201cMinorities and Direct Legislation,\u201d 154\u2013177.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-64\" href=\"#footnote-54-64\" aria-label=\"Footnote 64\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[64]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">That is not to say that these minority groups lose on every ballot measure. When a minority group is the target of a ballot measure, they generally find themselves outnumbered. Over the last thirty years, states have successfully passed ballot measures that ban same-sex marriage, implement anti\u2013affirmative action proposals, restrict the rights of immigrants, and so on. However, on initiatives or referendums where policy preferences cut across demographic groups, members of the majority and historically oppressed or vulnerable groups win at similar rates.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Hajnal, Gerber, and Louch et al., \u201cMinorities and Direct Legislation,\u201d 154\u2013177.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-65\" href=\"#footnote-54-65\" aria-label=\"Footnote 65\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[65]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> As a result, it is argued that direct democracy works for \u201cthe many rather than the few.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Matsusaka, For the Many or the Few.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-66\" href=\"#footnote-54-66\" aria-label=\"Footnote 66\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[66]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">The promise of direct or participatory democracy is that it promotes advantages even beyond the direct or instrumental benefits of the policies passed by the citizens.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Pateman, Participation and Democratic Theory; Barber, Strong Democracy.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-67\" href=\"#footnote-54-67\" aria-label=\"Footnote 67\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[67]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Living in a state with direct democracy is associated with all sorts of characteristics and virtues associated with democratic citizenship.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Bowler and Donovan, \u201cDemocracy, Institutions, and Attitudes,\u201d 371\u2013390; Smith and Tolbert, Educated by Initiative. But see Dyck and Lascher, Initiatives Without Engagement; Bernhard, \u201cDoes Direct Democracy Increase Civic Virtues?\u201d; Biggers, Morality at the Ballot.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-68\" href=\"#footnote-54-68\" aria-label=\"Footnote 68\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[68]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> This includes higher levels of political knowledge and political efficacy, or the belief that citizens can enact meaningful change. Citizens living in states with direct democratic institutions also report higher levels of personal trust and trust in government. The health or quality of democracy also is theoretically higher, as citizens participate and vote in greater numbers in states with direct democracy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">Citizens living in states with direct democracy report being happier and more satisfied with their lives.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Radcliff and Shufeldt, \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 1405\u20131423.\" id=\"return-footnote-54-69\" href=\"#footnote-54-69\" aria-label=\"Footnote 69\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[69]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> Arguably, more important as a democratic institution, the vast majority of citizens support direct democracy. A majority of Americans agree with statements like \u201cA democratic system where citizens, not elected officials, vote directly on major national issues to decide what becomes law would be a good way of governing the country\u201d or \u201cVoters should have the right to propose and pass laws through a citizen initiative process.\u201d<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Wike et al., \u201cRepresentative Democracy\u201d; Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, \u201c11-State Ballot Initiative.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-70\" href=\"#footnote-54-70\" aria-label=\"Footnote 70\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[70]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">While political scientists continue to weigh the benefits and shortcomings of direct democracy, these competing arguments have real-world consequences.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Donovan, \u201cPromise and Perils\u201d; Bowler and Donovan, \u201cEnduring Questions.\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-71\" href=\"#footnote-54-71\" aria-label=\"Footnote 71\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[71]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup> What citizens want, however, appears to be increasingly in conflict with their state government. Whether through legislation being considered by state legislatures or legislative referendums placed in front of voters, many states are attempting to roll back and make direct democracy more difficult to utilize.<sup class=\"import-enref\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Carter, Chapman, and Comella et al., \u201cPoliticians Take Aim\u201d; Ballotpedia, \u201cDifficulty Analysis\u201d; Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy\u201d; Matsusaka, \u201cDirect Democracy Backsliding?\u201d\" id=\"return-footnote-54-72\" href=\"#footnote-54-72\" aria-label=\"Footnote 72\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[72]<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-p\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt;\">For these states, they have direct democracy if they can keep it.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--key-takeaways\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Bibliography<\/p>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballot Initiative Strategy Center. \u201c11-State Ballot Initiative Voter Attitudes Research.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId146\" href=\"https:\/\/ballot.org\/11-state-ballot-initiative-voter-attitudes-research\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballot.org\/11-state-ballot-initiative-voter-attitudes-research\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cAbortion on the Ballot.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId147\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Abortion_on_the_ballot\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Abortion_on_the_ballot#By_year<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cBallot Measure Campaign Finance, 2022.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId148\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ballot_measure_campaign_finance,_2022\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ballot_measure_campaign_finance,_2022<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cBallot Measure Readability Scores, 2022.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId149\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ballot_measure_readability_scores,_2022\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ballot_measure_readability_scores,_2022#Historical_readability_s<\/span><span class=\"import-url\">cores<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cCalifornia Proposition 13, Tax Limitations Initiative (June 1978).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId150\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/California_Proposition_13,_Tax_Limitations_Initiative_(June_1978)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/California_Proposition_13,_Tax_Limitations_Initiative_(June_1978)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cConstitutional Amendment.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId151\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Constitutional_amendment\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Constitutional_amendment#<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cDifficulty Analysis of Changes to Laws Governing Ballot Measures.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId152\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Difficulty_analysis_of_changes_to_laws_governing_ballot_measures\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Difficulty_analysis_of_changes_to_laws_governing_ballot_measure<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cGavin Newsom Recall, Governor of California (2019\u20132021).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId153\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Gavin_Newsom_recall,_Governor_of_California_(2019-2021)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Gavin_Newsom_recall,_Governor_of_California_(2019-2021)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cGray Davis Recall, Governor of California (2003).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId154\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Gray_Davis_recall,_Governor_of_California_(2003)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Gray_Davis_recall,_Governor_of_California_(2003)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cLaws Governing Ballot Initiative Signature Gatherers.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId155\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Laws_governing_ballot_initiative_signature_gatherers\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Laws_governing_ballot_initiative_signature_gatherers<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cLength of Signature Gathering Periods for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId156\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Length_of_signature_gathering_periods_for_ballot_initiatives\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Length_of_signature_gathering_periods_for_ballot_initiatives<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cList of Veto Referendum Ballot Measures.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId157\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/List_of_veto_referendum_ballot_measures\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/List_of_veto_referendum_ballot_measures<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cOhio Issue 1, 60% Vote Requirement to Approve Constitutional Amendments Measure (2023).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId158\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ohio_Issue_1,_60%25_Vote_Requirement_to_Approve_Constitutional_Amendments_Measure_(2023)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ohio_Issue_1,_60%_Vote_Requirement_to_Approve_Constitutional_Amendments_Measure_(2023)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cOhio Issue 1, Right to Make Reproductive Decisions Including Abortion Initiative (2023).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId159\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ohio_Issue_1,_Right_to_Make_Reproductive_Decisions_Including_Abortion_Initiative_(2023)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Ohio_Issue_1,_Right_to_Make_Reproductive_Decisions_Including_Abortion_Initiative_(2023)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cRecall Overview.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId160\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Recall_overview\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Recall_overview<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cScott Walker Recall, Wisconsin (2011\u20132012).\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId161\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Scott_Walker_recall,_Wisconsin_(2011-2012)\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Scott_Walker_recall,_Wisconsin_(2011-2012)<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cSignature Distribution Requirements for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId162\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Signature_distribution_requirements_for_ballot_initiatives\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Signature_distribution_requirements_for_ballot_initiatives<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cSingle-Subject Rule for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId163\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Single-subject_rule_for_ballot_initiatives\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Single-subject_rule_for_ballot_initiatives<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cSubject Restrictions for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId164\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Subject_restrictions_for_ballot_initiatives\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Subject_restrictions_for_ballot_initiatives<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201cSupermajority Requirements for Ballot Measures.\u201d n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Supermajority_requirements_for_ballot_measures\"><span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Supermajority_requirements_for_ballot_measures<\/span><\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201c2023 and 2024 Abortion-Related Ballot Measures.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId165\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2023_and_2024_abortion-related_ballot_measures\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2023_and_2024_abortion-related_ballot_measures<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ballotpedia. \u201c2024 Ballot Measures.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId166\" href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2024_ballot_measures\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2024_ballot_measures<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Barber, B. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age<\/em><\/span>. University of California Press, 2003.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Barth, J., C. Burnett., and J. Parry. \u201cDirect Democracy, Educative Effects, and the (Mis)Measurement of Ballot Measure Awareness.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Political Behavior<\/em><\/span> 42 (2020): 1015\u20131034.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Beauchamp, Z. \u201cSen. Mike Lee\u2019s Tweets Against \u2018Democracy,\u2019 Explained.\u201d Vox, 2020. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId167\" href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/policy-and-politics\/21507713\/mike-lee-democracy-republic-trump-2020\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.vox.com\/policy-and-politics\/21507713\/mike-lee-democracy-republic-trump-2020<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bernhard, L. \u201cDoes Direct Democracy Increase Civic Virtues? A Systematic Literature Review.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Frontiers in Political Science<\/em><\/span> 6 (2024): 1287330.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Biggers, D. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Morality at the Ballot: Direct Democracy and Political Engagement in the United States<\/em><\/span>. Cambridge University Press, 2014.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Boehmke, F., T. Osborn, and E. Schilling. \u201cPivotal Politics and Initiative Use in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Political Research Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 68 (2015): 665\u2013677.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Boldt, A. \u201cDirect Democracy in the States: A 50-State Survey of the Journey to the Ballot.\u201d State Democracy Research Initiative, University of Wisconsin Law School, 2023. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId168\" href=\"https:\/\/statedemocracy.law.wisc.edu\/direct-democracy\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/statedemocracy.law.wisc.edu\/direct-democracy\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy<\/em><\/span>. University of Michigan Press, 1998.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. \u201cDemocracy, Institutions, and Attitudes About Citizen Influence on Government.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">British Journal of Political Science<\/em><\/span> 32 (2002): 371\u2013390.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. \u201cEnduring Questions and Unsatisfactory Answers About Direct Democracy.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics<\/em><\/span>. Oxford University Press, 2021.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The Limits of Electoral Reform<\/em><\/span>. Oxford University Press, 2013.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. \u201cMeasuring the Effect of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives Are Created Equal.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 4 (2004), 345\u2013363.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bryan, F. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How It Works<\/em><\/span>. University of Chicago Press, 2004.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Carter, S., A. Chapman, and A. Comella. \u201cPoliticians Take Aim at Ballot Initiatives.\u201d Brennan Center for Justice, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId169\" href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/research-reports\/politicians-take-aim-ballot-initiatives\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/research-reports\/politicians-take-aim-ballot-initiatives<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Churchill, W. \u201cThe Worst Form of Government.\u201d International Churchill Society, 2016. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId170\" href=\"https:\/\/winstonchurchill.org\/resources\/quotes\/the-worst-form-of-government\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/winstonchurchill.org\/resources\/quotes\/the-worst-form-of-government\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Council of State Governments. \u201cHow Ballot Measures Get on the Ballot.\u201d 2023. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId171\" href=\"https:\/\/www.csg.org\/2023\/11\/09\/how-ballot-measures-get-on-the-ballot\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.csg.org\/2023\/11\/09\/how-ballot-measures-get-on-the-ballot\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Crary, D. \u201cUS States Spit on Allowing Citizen Ballot Initiatives.\u201d Associated Press, 2018. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId172\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/efb5b289cfb544968c5b79c2d0be20f7\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/efb5b289cfb544968c5b79c2d0be20f7<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Cummins, J. \u201cAre Initiatives an End-Run Around the Legislative Process? Divided Government and Voter Support for California Initiatives.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 23 (2023): 443\u2013462.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Dave Leip\u2019s Atlas of US Elections. \u201c1892 Presidential General Election Results.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId173\" href=\"https:\/\/uselectionatlas.org\/RESULTS\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/uselectionatlas.org\/RESULTS\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Dobski, B. \u201cAmerica Is a Republic, Not a Democracy.\u201d Heritage Foundation, 2020. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId174\" href=\"https:\/\/www.heritage.org\/american-founders\/report\/america-republic-not-democracy\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.heritage.org\/american-founders\/report\/america-republic-not-democracy<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Donovan, T. \u201cThe Promise and Perils of Direct Democracy: An Introduction.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Politics and Governance<\/em><\/span> 7 (2019). <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17645\/pag.v7i2.2267<\/span><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Donovan, T., D. Smith, T. Osborn, and C. Mooney. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State and Local Politics: Institutions and Reform<\/em><\/span>. 4th ed. Cengage, 2015.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Drum, K. \u201cHappy 35th Birthday, Tax Revolt! Thanks for Destroying California.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Mother Jones<\/em><\/span>, 2013. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId175\" href=\"https:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/kevin-drum\/2013\/06\/tax-revolt-35th-anniversary-prop-13-california\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/kevin-drum\/2013\/06\/tax-revolt-35th-anniversary-prop-13-california\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Dyck, J. \u201cNew Directions for Empirical Studies of Direct Democracy.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Chapman Law Review<\/em><\/span> 19 (2015): 109\u2013128.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Dyck, J., and E. Lascher. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Initiatives Without Engagement: A Realistic Appraisal of Direct Democracy\u2019s Secondary Effects<\/em><\/span>. University of Michigan Press, 2019.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Dyck, J., and S. Pearson-Merkowitz. \u201cBallot Initiatives and Status Quo Bias.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 19 (2019): 180\u2013207.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ellis, R. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America<\/em><\/span>. University Press of Kansas, 2002.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Elmendorf, C., and D. Spencer. \u201cAre Ballot Titles Biased? Partisanship in California\u2019s Supervision of Direct Democracy.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">UC Irvine Law Review<\/em><\/span> 3 (2013): 511\u2013549.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Elvin, R. \u201cIs America a Democracy or a Republic? Yes, It Is.\u201d National Public Radio, 2022. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId176\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2022\/09\/10\/1122089076\/is-america-a-democracy-or-a-republic-yes-it-is\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2022\/09\/10\/1122089076\/is-america-a-democracy-or-a-republic-yes-it-is<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d 2021. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId177\" href=\"https:\/\/www.eda.admin.ch\/aboutswitzerland\/en\/home\/politik-geschichte\/politisches-system\/direkte-demokratie.html\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.eda.admin.ch\/aboutswitzerland\/en\/home\/politik-geschichte\/politisches-system\/direkte-demokratie.html#<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Ferraiolo, K. \u201cState Policy Activism via Direct Democracy in Response to Federal Partisan Polarization.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Publius: The Journal of Federalism<\/em><\/span> 47 (2017): 378\u2013402.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Fuller, J. \u201cWhy Are Ballot Measures So Darn Confusing? Because They Are Supposed to Be.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The Washington Post<\/em><\/span>, 2014. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId178\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/the-fix\/wp\/2014\/08\/05\/why-are-ballot-measures-so-darn-confusing-because-they-are-supposed-to-be\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/the-fix\/wp\/2014\/08\/05\/why-are-ballot-measures-so-darn-confusing-because-they-are-supposed-to-be\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Gamble, B. \u201cPutting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">American Journal of Political Science<\/em><\/span> 41 (1997): 245\u2013269.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Gerber, E. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Democracy<\/em><\/span>. Princeton University Press, 2011.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Grossman, M., and D. Hopkins. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats<\/em><\/span>. Oxford University Press, 2016.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Guttmacher Institute. \u201cState Bans on Abortion Through Pregnancy.\u201d 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId179\" href=\"https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/state-policy\/explore\/state-policies-abortion-bans\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/state-policy\/explore\/state-policies-abortion-bans<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Haider-Markel, D., A. Querze, and K. Lindman. \u201cLose, Win, or Draw? A Reexamination of Direct Democracy and Minority Rights.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Political Research Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 60 (2007): 304\u2013314.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hajnal, Z., E. Gerber, and H. Louch. \u201cMinorities and Direct Legislation: Evidence from California Ballot Proposition Elections.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Journal of Politics<\/em><\/span> 64 (2002): 154\u2013177.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hamilton, A., J. Madison., J. Jay, C. Rossiter, and C. Kessler. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The Federalist Papers<\/em><\/span>. Mentor, 1999.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hannah, A. L., and D. Mallinson. \u201cDefiant Innovation: The Adoption of Medical Marijuana Laws in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Policy Studies Journal<\/em><\/span> 46, no. 2 (2018): 402\u2013423.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hartig, H., A. Daniller, S. Keeter., and T. Van Green. \u201cRepublican Gains in 2022 Midterms Driven Mostly by Turnout Advantage.\u201d Pew Research Center, 2023. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId180\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/politics\/2023\/07\/12\/republican-gains-in-2022-midterms-driven-mostly-by-turnout-advantage\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/politics\/2023\/07\/12\/republican-gains-in-2022-midterms-driven-mostly-by-turnout-advantage\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hayward, S. \u201cThe Tax Revolt Turns 20.\u201d Hoover Institution, 1998. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId181\" href=\"https:\/\/www.hoover.org\/research\/tax-revolt-turns-20\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.hoover.org\/research\/tax-revolt-turns-20<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Hicks, W. \u201cInitiatives Within Representative Government: Political Competition and Initiative Use in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 21 (2021): 471\u2013494.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Initiative and Referendum Institute. \u201cThe History of the Initiative and Referendum Process in the United States.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId182\" href=\"https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/history-us-direct-democracy\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/history-us-direct-democracy<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Initiative and Referendum Institute. \u201cI&amp;R Historical Timeline.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId183\" href=\"https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/64fb2a824bc4a564c732b324\/t\/6547f6da992d3b25ee06bbae\/1699215066808\/Almanac - I&amp;R Historical Timeline (1).pdf\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/64fb2a824bc4a564c732b324\/t\/6547f6da992d3b25ee06bbae\/1699215066808\/Almanac &#8211; I&amp;R Historical Timeline (1).pdf<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Keating, J. 2020. \u201cThe Real Reason Why Republicans Keep Saying \u2018We\u2019re a Republic, Not a Democracy.\u2019\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Slate<\/em><\/span>, 2020. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId184\" href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/news-and-politics\/2020\/10\/republic-democracy-mike-lee-astra-taylor.html\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/slate.com\/news-and-politics\/2020\/10\/republic-democracy-mike-lee-astra-taylor.html<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Key, V. O. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936\u20131960<\/em><\/span>. Harvard University Press, 1966.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lacombe, S., and F. Boehmke. \u201cThe Initiative Process and Policy Innovation in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 21 (2021): 286\u2013305.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lakoff, G. \u201cWhy Are Many Ballot Measures So Confusing?\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The New York Times<\/em><\/span>, 2016. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId185\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/projects\/cp\/opinion\/election-night-2016\/why-are-many-ballot-measures-so-confusingly-worded\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/projects\/cp\/opinion\/election-night-2016\/why-are-many-ballot-measures-so-confusingly-worded<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lascher, E., M. Hagen, and S. Rochlin. \u201cGun Behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies, and Public Opinion.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Journal of Politics<\/em><\/span> 58 (1996): 760\u2013775.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lewis, D. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: A Critical Assessment of the Tyranny of the Majority in the American States<\/em><\/span>. Routledge, 2012.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lewis, D., S. Schneider, and W. Jacoby. \u201cThe Impact of Direct Democracy on State Spending Priorities.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Electoral Studies<\/em><\/span> 40 (2015): 531\u2013538.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lupia, A. \u201cDumber Than Chimps? An Assessment of Direct Democracy Voters.\u201d In <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Dangerous Democracy? The Battle over Ballot Initiatives in America<\/em><\/span>, edited by L. Sabato, B. Larson, and H. R. Ernst, 66\u201370. Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2001.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Lupia, A., and J. Matsusaka. \u201cDirect Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Annual Review of Political Science<\/em><\/span> 7 (2004): 463\u2013482.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Mallinson, D., and A. L. Hannah. \u201cPolicy and Political Learning: The Development of Medical Marijuana Policies in the States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Publius: The Journal of Federalism<\/em><\/span> 50, no. 3 (2020): 344\u2013369.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Matsusaka, J. \u201cDirect Democracy Backsliding? Quantifying the Prevalence and Investing Causes 1960\u20132022.\u201d Initiative and Referendum Institute, 2023. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId186\" href=\"https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/research-on-direct-democracy\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.initiativeandreferenduminstitute.org\/research-on-direct-democracy<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Matsusaka, J. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy<\/em><\/span>. University of Chicago Press, 2004.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Miller, J. \u201c\u2018A Republic If You Can Keep It\u2019: Elizabeth Willing Powel, Benjamin Franklin, and the James McHenry Journal.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Library of Congress Blogs<\/em><\/span>, 2022. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId187\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.loc.gov\/manuscripts\/2022\/01\/a-republic-if-you-can-keep-it-elizabeth-willing-powel-benjamin-franklin-and-the-james-mchenry-journal\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/blogs.loc.gov\/manuscripts\/2022\/01\/a-republic-if-you-can-keep-it-elizabeth-willing-powel-benjamin-franklin-and-the-james-mchenry-journal\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Mulvihill, G., and K. Kruesi. \u201cArizona and Missouri Join States with Abortion Amendments on the Ballot. What Would the Measures Do?\u201d Associated Press, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId188\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/abortion-election-2024-roe-ballot-4403190b898e501b0834053c3417d072\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/abortion-election-2024-roe-ballot-4403190b898e501b0834053c3417d072<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">National Conference of State Legislatures. \u201cInitiative and Referendum Overview and Resources.\u201d 2022. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId189\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-overview-and-resources\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-overview-and-resources<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">National Conference of State Legislatures. \u201cInitiative and Referendum States.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId190\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-states\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/initiative-and-referendum-states<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">National Public Radio. \u201cGray Davis Reflects on His Recall, as Californians Decide Gov. Newsom\u2019s Fate.\u201d 2021. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId191\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2021\/09\/12\/1036475253\/gray-davis-reflects-on-his-recall-as-californians-decide-gov-newsoms-fate\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2021\/09\/12\/1036475253\/gray-davis-reflects-on-his-recall-as-californians-decide-gov-newsoms-fate<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">New, M. \u201cThe Tax Revolt Turns 25.\u201d Cato Institute, 2003. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId192\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cato.org\/commentary\/tax-revolt-turns-25\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.cato.org\/commentary\/tax-revolt-turns-25<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Nicholson, S. \u201cThe Political Environment and Ballot Proposition Awareness.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">American Journal of Political Science<\/em><\/span> 47 (2003): 403\u2013410.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Nicholson, S. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Voting the Agenda: Candidates, Elections, and Ballot Propositions<\/em><\/span>. Princeton University Press, 2005.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Oyez. \u201cMeyer v. Grant.\u201d n.d. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId193\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1987\/87-920\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1987\/87-920<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Pateman, C. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Participation and Democratic Theory<\/em><\/span>. Cambridge University Press, 1970.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Perry, N., and L. Rathke. \u201cIn Vermont, \u2018Town Meeting\u2019 Is Democracy Embodied. What Can the Rest of the Country Learn from It?\u201d Associated Press, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId194\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/democracy-town-meeting-vermont-elections-civility-elmore-11d7d1b63037d054506e77e261aff87c\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/democracy-town-meeting-vermont-elections-civility-elmore-11d7d1b63037d054506e77e261aff87c<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Phillips, J. \u201cDoes the Citizen Initiative Weaken Party Government in the U.S. States?\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 8 (2008): 127\u2013149.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Piper, K. \u201cCalifornia\u2019s Ballot Initiative System Isn\u2019t Working. How Do We Fix It?\u201d Vox, 2020. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId195\" href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/future-perfect\/2020\/11\/6\/21549654\/california-ballot-initiative-proposition-direct-democracy\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.vox.com\/future-perfect\/2020\/11\/6\/21549654\/california-ballot-initiative-proposition-direct-democracy<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Pittman, A. \u201c\u2018Democracy Dies Blow by Blow\u2019: How Mississippi\u2019s Supreme Court Killed the Ballot Initiative Twice in 99 Years.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Mississippi Free Press<\/em><\/span>, 2021. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId196\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mississippifreepress.org\/democracy-dies-blow-by-blow-voters-ask-supreme-court-for-initiative-65-rehearing\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.mississippifreepress.org\/democracy-dies-blow-by-blow-voters-ask-supreme-court-for-initiative-65-rehearing\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Pott, M. \u201cWhy Republican Voters Support Ballot Initiatives Their Red States Do Not.\u201d FiveThirtyEight, 2022.<span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId197\" href=\"https:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/why-republican-voters-support-ballot-initiatives-their-red-states-do-not\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/why-republican-voters-support-ballot-initiatives-their-red-states-do-not\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Qvortrup, M. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Referendums Around the World<\/em><\/span>. Springer, 2024.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Radcliff, B., and G. Shufeldt. \u201cDirect Democracy and Subjective Well-Being: The Initiative and Life Satisfaction in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Social Indicators Research<\/em><\/span> 128 (2016): 1405\u20131423.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Rosenbaum, J. \u201cAbortion Rights on the Ballot May Not Be Bad News for Republicans Everywhere.\u201d National Public Radio, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId198\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2024\/04\/27\/1246609040\/abortion-rights-ballot-missouri-republicans\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2024\/04\/27\/1246609040\/abortion-rights-ballot-missouri-republicans<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Rovner, J. \u201cRepublican Candidates Are Downplaying Abortion, but It Keeps Coming Up.\u201d National Public Radio, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId199\" href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/shots-health-news\/2024\/07\/01\/nx-s1-5023157\/abortion-republican-candidates-voting-election-issue\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/shots-health-news\/2024\/07\/01\/nx-s1-5023157\/abortion-republican-candidates-voting-election-issue<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Sabato, L., B. Larson, and H. Ernst. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Dangerous Democracy? The Battle over Ballot Initiatives in America<\/em><\/span>. Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2001.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Simonovits, G., A. Guess, and J. Nagler. \u201cResponsiveness Without Representation: Evidence from Minimum Wage Laws in U.S. States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">American Journal of Political Science<\/em><\/span> 63 (2019): 401\u2013410.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Smith, D., and D. Fridkin. \u201cDelegating Direct Democracy: Interparty Legislative Competition and the Adoption of the Initiative in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">American Political Science Review<\/em><\/span> 102 (2008): 333\u2013350.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Smith, D., and C. Tolbert. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States<\/em><\/span>. University of Michigan Press, 2004.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Smith, D., and C. Tolbert. \u201cThe Instrumental and Educative Effects of Ballot Measures: Research on Direct Democracy in the American States.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">State Politics &amp; Policy Quarterly<\/em><\/span> 7 (2007): 416\u2013445.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Steck, E., A. Kaczynski, M. Chac\u00f3n, and P. Gallagher. \u201cRepublican Candidates Downplay Past Anti-Abortion Stances Ahead of 2024 Election.\u201d CNN, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId200\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/interactive\/2024\/04\/politics\/abortion-rights-republican-2024-election-dg\/index.html\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/interactive\/2024\/04\/politics\/abortion-rights-republican-2024-election-dg\/index.html<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Sundquist, J. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States<\/em><\/span>. Brookings Institution, 1983.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Thrush, G. \u201c\u2018We\u2019re Not a Democracy,\u2019 Says Mike Lee, a Republican Senator. That\u2019s a Good Thing, He Adds.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The New York Times<\/em><\/span>, 2020. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId201\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/10\/08\/us\/elections\/mike-lee-democracy.html\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/10\/08\/us\/elections\/mike-lee-democracy.html<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">United States Census Bureau. \u201cCensus Bureau Releases New Educational Attainment Data.\u201d 2023. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId202\" href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/newsroom\/press-releases\/2023\/educational-attainment-data.html\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.census.gov\/newsroom\/press-releases\/2023\/educational-attainment-data.html<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Vollers, A. \u201cDespite GOP Headwinds, Citizen-Led Abortion Measures Could Be on the Ballot in 9 States.\u201d Stateline, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId203\" href=\"https:\/\/stateline.org\/2024\/06\/21\/despite-gop-headwinds-citizen-led-abortion-measures-could-be-on-the-ballot-in-9-states\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/stateline.org\/2024\/06\/21\/despite-gop-headwinds-citizen-led-abortion-measures-could-be-on-the-ballot-in-9-states\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Wattenberg, M., I. McAllister, and A. Salvanto. \u201cHow Voting Is like Taking an SAT Test: An Analysis of American Voter Rolloff.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">American Politics Research<\/em><\/span> 28 (2000): 234\u2013250.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Wike, R., J. Fetterrolf, M. Smerkovich, S. Austin, S. Gubbala, and J. Lippert. \u201cRepresentative Democracy Remains a Popular Ideal, but People Around the World Are Critical of How It\u2019s Working.\u201d Pew Research Center, 2024. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId204\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/global\/2024\/02\/28\/representative-democracy-remains-a-popular-ideal-but-people-around-the-world-are-critical-of-how-its-working\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/global\/2024\/02\/28\/representative-democracy-remains-a-popular-ideal-but-people-around-the-world-are-critical-of-how-its-working\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Wilson, R. \u201c\u2018If This Thing Qualifies, I\u2019m Toast\u2019: An Oral History of the Gray Davis Recall in California.\u201d The Hill, 2021. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><a class=\"rId205\" href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/homenews\/campaign\/556014-if-this-thing-qualifies-im-toast-an-oral-history-of-the-gray-davis-recall\/\"><span class=\"import-url\">https:\/\/thehill.com\/homenews\/campaign\/556014-if-this-thing-qualifies-im-toast-an-oral-history-of-the-gray-davis-recall\/<\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Zimmerman, J. <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">The New England Town Meeting: Democracy in Action<\/em><\/span>, Praeger, 1999.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Zuckerman, M. \u201cMirage of Democracy: The Town Meeting in America.\u201d <span style=\"border: none windowtext 0pt; padding: 0;\"><em class=\"import-i\">Journal of Public Deliberation<\/em><\/span> 15 (2019): Article 3.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"before-footnotes clear\" \/><div class=\"footnotes\"><ol><li id=\"footnote-54-1\">Miller, \u201c\u2018Republic If You Can Keep It.\u2019\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-1\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 1\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-2\">Beauchamp, \u201cSen. Mike Lee\u2019s Tweets\u201d; Dobski, \u201cAmerican Is a Republic\u201d; Elvin, \u201cIs America a Democracy?\u201d; Keating, \u201cReal Reason Why\u201d; Thrush, \u201c\u2018We\u2019re Not a Democracy.\u2019\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-2\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 2\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-3\">Hamilton et al., Federalist Papers. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-3\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 3\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-4\">Churchill, \u201cWorst Form of Government.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-4\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 4\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-5\">Ballotpedia, \u201cConstitutional Amendment.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-5\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 5\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-6\">National Conference of State Legislatures, \u201cInitiative and Referendum States.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-6\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 6\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-7\">Pittman, \u201c\u2018Democracy Dies Blow by Blow.\u2019\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-7\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 7\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-8\">Pittman, \u201c\u2018Democracy Dies Blow by Blow.\u2019\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-8\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 8\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-9\">Ballotpedia, \u201c2024 Ballot Measures.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-9\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 9\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-10\">Ballotpedia, \u201cList of Veto Referendum Ballot Measures.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-10\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 10\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-11\">National Conference of State Legislatures, \u201cInitiative and Referendum Overview.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-11\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 11\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-12\">Ballotpedia, \u201c2024 Ballot Measures.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-12\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 12\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-13\">Qvortrup, Referendums Around the World. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-13\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 13\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-14\">Ballotpedia, \u201cRecall Overview.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-14\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 14\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-15\">Wilson, \u201c\u2018If This Thing Qualifies.\u2019\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-15\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 15\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-16\">Ballotpedia, \u201cGray Davis Recall\u201d; National Public Radio, \u201cGray Davis Reflects.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-16\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 16\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-17\">Ballotpedia, \u201cScott Walker Recall\u201d; Ballotpedia, \u201cGavin Newsom Recall.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-17\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 17\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-18\">Bryan, Real Democracy; Zimmerman, New England Town Meeting; Zuckerman, \u201cMirage of Democracy.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-18\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 18\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-19\">Perry and Rathke, \u201cIn Vermont, \u2018Town Meeting.\u2019\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-19\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 19\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-20\">Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cI&amp;R Historical Timeline\u201d; Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cHistory of the Initiative.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-20\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 20\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-21\">Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-21\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 21\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-22\">Sundquist, Dynamics of the Party System. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-22\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 22\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-23\">Dave Leip\u2019s Atlas of U.S. Elections, \u201c1892 Presidential General Election Results.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-23\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 23\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-24\">Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cI&amp;R Historical Timeline\u201d; Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cHistory of the Initiative\u201d; Smith and Fridkin, \u201cDelegating Direct Democracy,\u201d 333\u2013350. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-24\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 24\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-25\">Pittman, \u201c\u2018Democracy Dies Blow by Blow.\u2019\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-25\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 25\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-26\">Crary, \u201cUS States Spit.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-26\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 26\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-27\">Ballotpedia, \u201cCalifornia Proposition 13\u201d; Hayward, \u201cTax Revolt Turns 20\u201d; New, \u201cTax Revolt Turns 25\u201d; Drum, \u201cHappy 35th Birthday, Tax Revolt.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-27\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 27\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-28\">Bowler and Donovan, \u201cMeasuring the Effect,\u201d 345\u2013363. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-28\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 28\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-29\">The Council of State Governments, \u201cHow Ballot Measures Get on the Ballot\u201d; Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-29\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 29\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-30\">The Council of State Governments, \u201cHow Ballot Measures Get on the Ballot.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-30\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 30\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-31\">Ballotpedia, \u201cSubject Restrictions for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-31\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 31\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-32\">Ballotpedia, \u201cSingle-Subject Rule for Ballot Initiatives.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-32\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 32\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-33\">Fuller, \u201cWhy Are Ballot Measures So Darn Confusing?\u201d; Lakoff, \u201cWhy Are Many Ballot Measures So Confusing?\u201d; Elmendorf and Spencer, \u201cAre Ballot Titles Biased?,\u201d 511\u2013549. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-33\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 33\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-34\">Ballotpedia, \u201cBallot Measure Readability Scores, 2022.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-34\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 34\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-35\">United States Census Bureau, \u201cCensus Bureau Releases\u201d; Hartig et al., \u201cRepublican Gains.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-35\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 35\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-36\">Ballotpedia, \u201cSignature Distribution Requirements.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-36\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 36\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-37\">Ballotpedia, \u201cOhio Issue 1, 60% Vote.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-37\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 37\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-38\">Ballotpedia, \u201cLength of Signature Gathering.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-38\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 38\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-39\">Oyez, \u201cMeyer v. Grant.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-39\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 39\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-40\">Ballotpedia, \u201cLaws Governing Ballot Initiative.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-40\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 40\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-41\">Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-41\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 41\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-42\">Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-42\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 42\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-43\">Ballotpedia, \u201cSupermajority Requirements.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-43\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 43\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-44\">Dyck, \u201cNew Directions,\u201d 109\u2013128; Smith and Tolbert, \u201cInstrumental and Educative Effects,\u201d 416\u2013445; Lupia and Matsusaka, \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 463\u2013482. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-44\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 44\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-45\">Donovan, Smith, Osborn, and Mooney et al., State and Local Politics. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-45\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 45\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-46\">Phillips, \u201cDoes the Citizen Initiative Weaken?,\u201d 127\u2013149; Ferraiolo, \u201cState Policy Activism,\u201d 378\u2013402; Lacombe and Boehmke, \u201cInitiative Process,\u201d 286\u2013305; Hicks, \u201cInitiatives,\u201d 471\u2013494; Cummins, \u201cAre Initiatives an End-Run,\u201d 443\u2013462. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-46\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 46\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-47\">Pott, \u201cWhy Republican Voters Support\u201d; Simonovits, Guess, and Nagler et al., \u201cResponsiveness Without Representation,\u201d 401\u2013410; Vollers, \u201cDespite GOP Headwinds.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-47\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 47\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-48\">Bowler and Donovan, Limits of Electoral Reform. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-48\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 48\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-49\">Mallinson and Hannah, \u201cPolicy and Political Learning,\u201d 344\u2013369; Hannah and Mallinson, \u201cDefiant Innovation,\u201d 402\u2013423. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-49\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 49\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-50\">Lascher, Hagen, and Rochlin et al., \u201cGun Behind the Door?,\u201d 760\u2013775; Lewis, Schneider, and Jacoby et al., \u201cImpact of Direct Democracy,\u201d 531\u2013538; Boehmke, Osborn, and Schilling et al., \u201cPivotal Politics,\u201d 665\u2013677; Simonovits, Guess, and Nagler et al., \u201cResponsiveness Without Representation,\u201d 401\u2013410. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-50\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 50\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-51\">Nicholson, Voting the Agenda; Smith and Tolbert, Educated by Initiative; Smith and Tolbert, \u201cInstrumental and Educative Effects,\u201d 416\u2013445. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-51\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 51\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-52\">Ballotpedia, \u201c2023 and 2024 Abortion-Related Ballot Measures.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-52\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 52\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-53\">Rovner, \u201cRepublican Candidates Are Downplaying Abortion\u201d; Rosenbaum, \u201cAbortion Rights on the Ballot\u201d; Steck et al., \u201cRepublican Candidates Downplay.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-53\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 53\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-54\">Lupia, \u201cDumber Than Chimps?\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-54\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 54\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-55\">Key, Responsible Electorate. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-55\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 55\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-56\">Nicholson, Voting the Agenda; Barth, Burnett, and Parry et al., \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 1015\u20131034. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-56\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 56\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-57\">Smith and Tolbert, Educated by Initiative; Lupia and Matsusaka, \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 463\u2013482. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-57\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 57\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-58\">Dyck and Pearson-Merkowitz, \u201cBallot Initiatives,\u201d 180\u2013207. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-58\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 58\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-59\">Nicholson, \u201cPolitical Environment,\u201d 403\u2013410; Wattenberg, McAllister, and Salvanto et al., \u201cHow Voting Is lLike Taking an SAT Test\u201d; Bowler and Donovan, Demanding Choices. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-59\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 59\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-60\">Piper, \u201cCalifornia\u2019s Ballot Initiative System\u201d; Grossman and Hopkins, Asymmetric Politics. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-60\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 60\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-61\">Gerber, Populist Paradox; Ellis, Democratic Delusions; Sabato, Larson, and Ernst et al., Dangerous Democracy? <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-61\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 61\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-62\">Initiative and Referendum Institute, \u201cI&amp;R Historical Timeline.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-62\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 62\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-63\">Ballotpedia, \u201cBallot Measure Campaign Finance, 2022.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-63\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 63\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-64\">Gamble, \u201cPutting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote,\u201d 245\u2013269; Lewis, Direct Democracy and Minority Rights; Haider-Markel, Querze, and Lindman et al., \u201cLose, Win, or Draw?,\u201d 304\u2013314; Hajnal, Gerber, and Louch et al., \u201cMinorities and Direct Legislation,\u201d 154\u2013177. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-64\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 64\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-65\">Hajnal, Gerber, and Louch et al., \u201cMinorities and Direct Legislation,\u201d 154\u2013177. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-65\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 65\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-66\">Matsusaka, For the Many or the Few. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-66\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 66\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-67\">Pateman, Participation and Democratic Theory; Barber, Strong Democracy. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-67\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 67\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-68\">Bowler and Donovan, \u201cDemocracy, Institutions, and Attitudes,\u201d 371\u2013390; Smith and Tolbert, Educated by Initiative. But see Dyck and Lascher, Initiatives Without Engagement; Bernhard, \u201cDoes Direct Democracy Increase Civic Virtues?\u201d; Biggers, Morality at the Ballot. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-68\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 68\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-69\">Radcliff and Shufeldt, \u201cDirect Democracy,\u201d 1405\u20131423. <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-69\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 69\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-70\">Wike et al., \u201cRepresentative Democracy\u201d; Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, \u201c11-State Ballot Initiative.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-70\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 70\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-71\">Donovan, \u201cPromise and Perils\u201d; Bowler and Donovan, \u201cEnduring Questions.\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-71\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 71\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-54-72\">Carter, Chapman, and Comella et al., \u201cPoliticians Take Aim\u201d; Ballotpedia, \u201cDifficulty Analysis\u201d; Boldt, \u201cDirect Democracy\u201d; Matsusaka, \u201cDirect Democracy Backsliding?\u201d <a href=\"#return-footnote-54-72\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 72\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"author":3,"menu_order":14,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":["gregory-shufeldt"],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[63],"license":[],"part":3,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/54"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"version-history":[{"count":29,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/54\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":519,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/54\/revisions\/519"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/3"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/54\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=54"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=54"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.palni.org\/theexcitingdynamicsofstateandlocalgovernment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=54"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}